Literature DB >> 21364677

Exploring ultrashort high-energy electron-induced damage in human carcinoma cells.

O Rigaud, N O Fortunel, P Vaigot, E Cadio, M T Martin, O Lundh, J Faure, C Rechatin, V Malka, Y A Gauduel.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21364677      PMCID: PMC3032345          DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2010.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Death Dis            Impact factor:   8.469


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, In conventional cancer therapy or fundamental radiobiology research, the accumulated knowledge on the complex responses of healthy or diseased cells to ionizing radiation is generally obtained with low-dose rates. Under these radiation conditions, the time spent for energy deposition is very long compared with the dynamics of early molecular and cellular responses. The energy depositions occur concomitantly with primary radio-chemical events (radical reactions), multiple biomolecular damage (membrane and DNA lesions), and repair.[1] Such interferences may significantly influence the efficiency of signalling channels and repair processes or the recruitment of transducer proteins for programmed cell death or senescence. They render more complex or uncertain (i) a precise understanding of time-dependent relationships between the initial ionization density profile and the integrated complex response of normal or malignant tumour cells, and (ii) a complete description of biomolecule modifications and genome alterations resulting from energy deposition. The use of ultrashort pulsed radiation would offer new perspectives for exploring the ‘black box' aspects of long irradiation profiles and favouring the selective control of early damage in living targets. Several attempts were previously performed using nanosecond or picosecond pulsed irradiations on various mammalian cells and radiosensitive mutants at high dose rate.[2, 3, 4, 5] The effects of single or multi-pulsed radiations on cell populations were generally analyzed in the framework of dose survival curves or characterized by 2D imaging of γ-H2AX foci and no increase in cytotoxicity was shown compared with a delivery at a conventional dose rate. Moreover, when multi-shot irradiations were performed, the overall time needed to obtain an integrated dose of several Grays again overlapped with the multi-scale dynamics of biomolecular damage–repair sequences and cell signalling steps. Ideally, a single-shot irradiation delivering a well-defined energy profile, via a very short temporal window, would permit the approach of a real-time investigation of early radiation-induced molecular damage within the confined spaces of cell compartments. Owing to the potential applications of intense ultrashort laser for radiation therapy,[6] the model of the A431 carcinoma cell line was chosen. An ultrafast single-shot irradiation strategy was carried out with these radio-resistant human skin carcinoma cells,[7] using the capacity of an innovating laser-plasma accelerator to generate quasi mono-energetic femtosecond electron bunches in the MeV domain and to deliver a very high dose rate of 1013 Gy s−1 per pulse.[8, 9] The alkaline comet assay,[10, 11] which is commonly used to quantify global DNA damage in individual cells (single-, double-strand breaks, and alkali-labile sites), was applied to detect the impact of the 100 fs single-shot 1 Gy exposure with electrons of mean energy 95 MeV (Figure 1). The initial distribution of irradiated cells as a function of the comet tail moment, which reflects the level of DNA damage, shows a shift towards a population of more damaged cells, as compared with the sham-irradiated cells. The fraction of cells with damage above a control tail moment value of 4 exhibited an eightfold increase over that of the control cells. When carcinoma cells were maintained for 60 min at 37°C before the comet assay to allow DNA repair, the distributions of irradiated and non-irradiated cells became similar, indicating repair of the DNA lesions. The recovery of a near homogeneous distribution of low comet tail moments argues for the reparability of the global DNA lesions triggered by a single femtosecond irradiation shot at 1 Gy. To assess the consequences of ultrafast electron-induced damage, the cytotoxicity was characterized in the same experiment, using a novel survival assay at a single-cell level.[12] Two weeks after the femtosecond 1 Gy irradiation, a 95% survival was observed from a panel of 300 cells seeded in clonal microcultures.
Figure 1

Induction of DNA damage in skin carcinoma cells irradiated at a very high dose rate by a single ultrashort bunch of high-energy electrons. (a) Image showing the overlap between the 2D dose deposition of a femtosecond quasi-monoenergetic electron bunch (100 fs pulse duration, mean energy of 95 MeV) and the pellet containing about 5 × 105 human skin carcinoma cells. The dose delivered in the pellet (semi-ellipse) by an ultrafast single shot (1.02±0.13 Gy, dose rate 1013 Gy s−1) is determined from Monte Carlo calculations. The exact number of electrons is deduced from scintillator measurements, which have been absolutely calibrated.[9] (b, c) Time-dependent evaluation of DNA damage using the alkaline comet assay for sham-irradiated (0 Gy) and irradiated carcinoma cells (1 Gy) immediately after the femtosecond irradiation (b) and after 1 h of repair time at 37°C (c). The frequencies of cells as a function of their damage level expressed by the comet tail moments are shown (300 comets analyzed per sample using Komet 6 software, Kinetic Imaging Ltd., Bromborough, UK). Gray bars represent the % of cells above a tail moment of 4 (arbitrary unit). A significant difference between the distributions of 0 and 1 Gy samples was found for initial damage (χ2 test, P<0.002)

This first investigation of a single-shot 1 Gy irradiation performed at high energy level and very high dose rate demonstrates that a measurable assessment of immediate and reversible DNA damage in carcinoma cells can be explored at the single-cell level. This breakthrough opens the possibility of a complete characterization of induced damage and repair, and notably of DNA double-strand breaks. In the framework of advanced spatio-temporal radiation biology concepts,[13] one challenge of such a non-conventional irradiation concerns the complete understanding of the multi-scale events triggered by the initial energy deposition, starting from the production and amplification of the localized radical processes and the induction of the primary lesions. A second challenge is deciphering the integrated cell response to these primary events, including cell signalling, damage sensing and DNA repair, and characterizing their late effects in cells, such as cell death, gene mutation and genomic instability. The emergence of ultrafast high-energy radiation biology could foreshadow the time-dependent and nanometric spatially defined effects in biomolecular architectures, such as aqueous groove of DNA, nucleosomes, protein pockets and sub-cellular compartments. Establishing an innovating approach of real-time nanodosimetry represents a prerequisite for the control of irradiations of living cells at very high dose rates. Moreover, the influence of the quality of short-pulsed particle beams (electrons and protons) on the relative biological efficiency (RBE) needs to be carefully evaluated, in synergy with ultrafast dose-fractionating protocols. Such knowledge is a necessary step before medical applications of ultrashort laser-accelerated particle beams. Currently, X-rays in the few MeV energy range represent the majority of ionizing radiations used for cancer therapy. The dose deposited by very high-energy electron beams in the tissue depth is higher and could be beneficial to target deep tumors.[14] Specific conditions afforded by very high dose rates and ultrashort dose fractionations would permit the real-time control of amplified radio-sensitivity during selective targeting protocols, in combination with the modern prodrug strategies developed in chemotherapy.[15] Ultrafast radiation biology thus represents a newly emerging interdisciplinary field, in strong synergy with the most recent progresses of ultrashort radiation sources, high-energy bioradical femtochemistry, molecular biology and anti-cancer therapy.
  11 in total

1.  Effects of single-pulse (< or = 1 ps) X-rays from laser-produced plasmas on mammalian cells.

Authors:  Kunio Shinohara; Hisako Nakano; Noriyuki Miyazaki; Masao Tago; Ryosuke Kodama
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Controlled injection and acceleration of electrons in plasma wakefields by colliding laser pulses.

Authors:  J Faure; C Rechatin; A Norlin; A Lifschitz; Y Glinec; V Malka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Prodrug strategies in anticancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Felix Kratz; Ivonne A Müller; Claudia Ryppa; André Warnecke
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Biochemical alterations in human cells irradiated with alpha particles delivered by macro- or microbeams.

Authors:  Nathalie Gault; Odile Rigaud; Jean-Luc Poncy; Jean-Louis Lefaix
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  Tools to study DNA repair: what's in the box?

Authors:  Sascha Feuerhahn; Jean-Marc Egly
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 6.  Ultra-short electron beams based spatio-temporal radiation biology and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Victor Malka; Jérôme Faure; Yann A Gauduel
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Exploration of the functional hierarchy of the basal layer of human epidermis at the single-cell level using parallel clonal microcultures of keratinocytes.

Authors:  Nicolas O Fortunel; Emmanuelle Cadio; Pierre Vaigot; Loubna Chadli; Sandra Moratille; Stéphan Bouet; Paul-Henri Roméo; Michèle T Martin
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.960

8.  Survival of mammalian cells exposed to ultrahigh dose rates from a laser-produced plasma x-ray source.

Authors:  C Tillman; G Grafström; A C Jonsson; B A Jönsson; I Mercer; S Mattsson; S E Strand; S Svanberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The comet assay: a method to measure DNA damage in individual cells.

Authors:  Peggy L Olive; Judit P Banáth
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  Radiation response of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (UM-SCV-1A, UM-SCV-1B, UM-SCV-2, and A-431) cells in vitro.

Authors:  K Pekkola-Heino; J Kulmala; S Grenman; T E Carey; R Grenman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  16 in total

1.  Observation of longitudinal and transverse self-injections in laser-plasma accelerators.

Authors:  S Corde; C Thaury; A Lifschitz; G Lambert; K Ta Phuoc; X Davoine; R Lehe; D Douillet; A Rousse; V Malka
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Radiobiological influence of megavoltage electron pulses of ultra-high pulse dose rate on normal tissue cells.

Authors:  Lydia Laschinsky; Leonhard Karsch; Elisabeth Leßmann; Melanie Oppelt; Jörg Pawelke; Christian Richter; Michael Schürer; Elke Beyreuther
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Cell death in disease: from 2010 onwards.

Authors:  R A Knight; G Melino
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 8.469

4.  The Effect of Low-Energy Laser-Driven Ultrashort Pulsed Electron Beam Irradiation on Erythropoiesis and Oxidative Stress in Rats.

Authors:  Gohar Tsakanova; Aida Avetisyan; Elena Karalova; Liana Abroyan; Lina Hakobyan; Anna Semerjyan; Naira Karalyan; Elina Arakelova; Violetta Ayvazyan; Lusine Matevosyan; Arpine Navasardyan; Anna Ayvazyan; Hakob Davtyan; Bagrat Grigoryan; Arsen Arakelyan; Zaven Karalyan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  FGF2 mediates DNA repair in epidermoid carcinoma cells exposed to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Mélanie Marie; Sophia Hafner; Sandra Moratille; Pierre Vaigot; Solène Mine; Odile Rigaud; Michèle T Martin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Analysis of apoptosis methods recently used in Cancer Research and Cell Death & Disease publications.

Authors:  O Bucur; A L Stancu; R Khosravi-Far; A Almasan
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 8.469

7.  Survival of tumor cells after proton irradiation with ultra-high dose rates.

Authors:  Susanne Auer; Volker Hable; Christoph Greubel; Guido A Drexler; Thomas E Schmid; Claus Belka; Günther Dollinger; Anna A Friedl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Picosecond metrology of laser-driven proton bursts.

Authors:  B Dromey; M Coughlan; L Senje; M Taylor; S Kuschel; B Villagomez-Bernabe; R Stefanuik; G Nersisyan; L Stella; J Kohanoff; M Borghesi; F Currell; D Riley; D Jung; C-G Wahlström; C L S Lewis; M Zepf
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Current concepts in clinical radiation oncology.

Authors:  Michael Orth; Kirsten Lauber; Maximilian Niyazi; Anna A Friedl; Minglun Li; Cornelius Maihöfer; Lars Schüttrumpf; Anne Ernst; Olivier M Niemöller; Claus Belka
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Dose-rate effect of ultrashort electron beam radiation on DNA damage and repair in vitro.

Authors:  Nelly Babayan; Galina Hovhannisyan; Bagrat Grigoryan; Ruzanna Grigoryan; Natalia Sarkisyan; Gohar Tsakanova; Samvel Haroutiunian; Rouben Aroutiounian
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.