Literature DB >> 18675488

Tools to study DNA repair: what's in the box?

Sascha Feuerhahn1, Jean-Marc Egly.   

Abstract

Our understanding of the DNA repair mechanisms that preserve genome integrity has increased greatly in recent years. To follow the DNA repair process, researchers have developed sophisticated techniques including live cell imaging, local damage induction and refined biochemical assays. These techniques have helped to elucidate the 'orchestration' of DNA repair mechanisms (i.e. the order of factor assembly around the lesion, the identification of new functions of known factors and the discovery of novel key regulators involved in DNA repair). We will discuss the uses and the limitations of these methods and their applications in the study of DNA repair.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18675488     DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  15 in total

1.  An ultrasoft X-ray multi-microbeam irradiation system for studies of DNA damage responses by fixed- and live-cell fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Carel van Oven; Przemek M Krawczyk; Jan Stap; Arline M Melo; Maria H O Piazzetta; Angelo L Gobbi; Henk A van Veen; Jan Verhoeven; Jacob A Aten
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Drosophila p53 is required to increase the levels of the dKDM4B demethylase after UV-induced DNA damage to demethylate histone H3 lysine 9.

Authors:  Zoraya Palomera-Sanchez; Alyeri Bucio-Mendez; Viviana Valadez-Graham; Enrique Reynaud; Mario Zurita
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Preferential repair of DNA double-strand break at the active gene in vivo.

Authors:  Priyasri Chaurasia; Rwik Sen; Tej K Pandita; Sukesh R Bhaumik
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Single-molecule DNA repair in live bacteria.

Authors:  Stephan Uphoff; Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe; Federico Garza de Leon; David J Sherratt; Achillefs N Kapanidis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The Cockayne syndrome group A and B proteins are part of a ubiquitin-proteasome degradation complex regulating cell division.

Authors:  Elena Paccosi; Federico Costanzo; Michele Costantino; Alessio Balzerano; Laura Monteonofrio; Silvia Soddu; Giorgio Prantera; Stefano Brancorsini; Jean-Marc Egly; Luca Proietti-De-Santis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Two- and three-dimensional live cell imaging of DNA damage response proteins.

Authors:  Jason M Beckta; Scott C Henderson; Kristoffer Valerie
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  RB·E2F1 complex mediates DNA damage responses through transcriptional regulation of ZBRK1.

Authors:  Ching-Chun Liao; Connie Y Tsai; Wen-Chang Chang; Wen-Hwa Lee; Ju-Ming Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Regulation of active genome integrity and expression by Rad26p.

Authors:  Shivani Malik; Sukesh R Bhaumik
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 4.197

9.  The shape of the radiation dose response for DNA double-strand break induction and repair.

Authors:  Stephen Barnard; Simon Bouffler; Kai Rothkamm
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2013-03-22

10.  Recruitment kinetics of DNA repair proteins Mdc1 and Rad52 but not 53BP1 depend on damage complexity.

Authors:  Volker Hable; Guido A Drexler; Tino Brüning; Christian Burgdorf; Christoph Greubel; Anja Derer; Judith Seel; Hilmar Strickfaden; Thomas Cremer; Anna A Friedl; Günther Dollinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.