Literature DB >> 21364140

Antihypertensive treatment and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events among persons without hypertension: a meta-analysis.

Angela M Thompson1, Tian Hu, Carrie L Eshelbrenner, Kristi Reynolds, Jiang He, Lydia A Bazzano.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk increases beginning at systolic blood pressure levels of 115 mm Hg. Use of antihypertensive medications among patients with a history of CVD or diabetes and without hypertension has been debated.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of antihypertensive treatment on secondary prevention of CVD events and all-cause mortality among persons without clinically defined hypertension. DATA SOURCES: Meta-analysis with systematic search of MEDLINE (1950 to week 3 of January 2011), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials and manual examination of references in selected articles and studies. STUDY SELECTION: From 874 potentially relevant publications, 25 trials that fulfilled the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Information on participant characteristics, trial design and duration, treatment drug, dose, control, and clinical events were extracted using a standardized protocol. Outcomes included stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), composite CVD outcomes, CVD mortality, and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: Compared with controls, participants receiving antihypertensive medications had a pooled relative risk of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.98) for stroke, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.93) for MI, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.77) for CHF, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90) for composite CVD events, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.99) for CVD mortality, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.95) for all-cause mortality from random-effects models. The corresponding absolute risk reductions per 1000 persons were -7.7 (95% CI, -15.2 to -0.3) for stroke, -13.3 (95% CI, -28.4 to 1.7) for MI, -43.6 (95% CI, -65.2 to -22.0) for CHF events, -27.1 (95% CI, -40.3 to -13.9) for composite CVD events, -15.4 (95% CI, -32.5 to 1.7) for CVD mortality, and -13.7 (95% CI, -24.6 to -2.8) for all-cause mortality. Results did not differ according to trial characteristics or subgroups defined by clinical history.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with clinical history of CVD but without hypertension, antihypertensive treatment was associated with decreased risk of stroke, CHF, composite CVD events, and all-cause mortality. Additional randomized trial data are necessary to assess these outcomes in patients without CVD clinical recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21364140      PMCID: PMC4313888          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  73 in total

1.  Blood-pressure reduction and cardiovascular risk in HOPE study.

Authors:  P Sleight; S Yusuf; J Pogue; R Tsuyuki; R Diaz; J Probstfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The EUROPA trial: design, baseline demography and status of the substudies.

Authors:  A H Gomma; K M Fox
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.727

3.  Drug treatment of prehypertension: Not now, not ever?

Authors:  Gordon T McInnes
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Unresolved issues in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Assessment of frequency of progression to hypertension in non-hypertensive participants in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study.

Authors:  R S Vasan; M G Larson; E P Leip; W B Kannel; D Levy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Long-term mortality in patients with myocardial infarction: impact of early treatment with captopril for 4 weeks.

Authors:  L Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6,105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Treating prehypertension: medically sound and economically viable.

Authors:  Amanda Elisabeth Kiely; Shawn Gaurav Kwatra; Madan Mohan Kwatra
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 10.  Prehypertension: epidemiology, consequences and treatment.

Authors:  Eduardo Pimenta; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 28.314

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology and prevention of stroke: a worldwide perspective.

Authors:  Elena V Kuklina; Xin Tong; Mary G George; Pooja Bansil
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.618

2.  Effects of anti-hypertensive treatment on major cardiovascular events in populations within prehypertensive levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongqiu Hong; Tao Wu; Shuxian Zhou; Boshui Huang; Jingfeng Wang; Dongmei Jin; Dengfeng Geng
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  [Therapeutic targets in arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Can medical prevention be harmful?].

Authors:  C Chatzikyrkou; H Haller; J Menne
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Can treating the diastolic blood pressure below a certain value increase cardiovascular risk?

Authors:  Norman M Kaplan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  What is the ideal blood pressure goal for patients with stage III or higher chronic kidney disease?

Authors:  Yazan Khouri; Susan P Steigerwalt; Mershed Alsamara; Peter A McCullough
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Renin-angiotensin system blockade: time for a reappraisal?

Authors:  Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Significant racial differences in the key factors associated with early graft loss in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  David J Taber; Kevin Douglass; Titte Srinivas; John W McGillicuddy; Charles F Bratton; Kenneth D Chavin; Prabhakar K Baliga; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 8.  Heart failure in hypertension: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Vasiliki V Georgiopoulou; Andreas P Kalogeropoulos; Javed Butler
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Are there consequences of labeling patients with prehypertension? An experimental study of effects on blood pressure and quality of life.

Authors:  Tanya M Spruill; Seth D Feltheimer; Manjunath Harlapur; Joseph E Schwartz; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Youngjun Park; William Gerin
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Using benefit-based tailored treatment to improve the use of antihypertensive medications.

Authors:  Jeremy Sussman; Sandeep Vijan; Rod Hayward
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.