OBJECTIVE: The authors used resting-state functional connectivity MRI to evaluate brain networks in patients with refractory and nonrefractory major depressive disorder. METHOD: In a cross-sectional study, 28 patients with refractory major depression, 32 patients with nonrefractory major depression, and 48 healthy comparison subjects underwent scanning using a gradient-echo echo-planar imaging sequence on a 3-T MR system. Thirteen regions of interest that have been identified in the literature as relevant to mood regulation were selected as seed areas. A reference time series was extracted for each seed and used for voxel-wise correlation analysis with the rest of the brain. Voxel-based comparisons of z-value maps among the three groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc t tests with age and duration of illness as covariates of no interest. RESULTS: Relative to healthy comparison subjects, both patient groups showed significantly reduced connectivity in prefrontal-limbic-thalamic areas bilaterally. However, the nonrefractory group showed a more distributed decrease in connectivity than the refractory group, especially in the anterior cingulate cortex and in the amygdala, hippocampus, and insula bilaterally; in contrast, the refractory group showed disrupted functional connectivity mainly in prefrontal areas and in thalamus areas bilaterally. CONCLUSIONS: Refractory depression is associated with disrupted functional connectivity mainly in thalamo-cortical circuits, while nonrefractory depression is associated with more distributed decreased connectivity in the limbic-striatal-pallidal-thalamic circuit. These results suggest that nonrefractory and refractory depression are characterized by distinct functional deficits in distributed brain networks.
OBJECTIVE: The authors used resting-state functional connectivity MRI to evaluate brain networks in patients with refractory and nonrefractory major depressive disorder. METHOD: In a cross-sectional study, 28 patients with refractory major depression, 32 patients with nonrefractory major depression, and 48 healthy comparison subjects underwent scanning using a gradient-echo echo-planar imaging sequence on a 3-T MR system. Thirteen regions of interest that have been identified in the literature as relevant to mood regulation were selected as seed areas. A reference time series was extracted for each seed and used for voxel-wise correlation analysis with the rest of the brain. Voxel-based comparisons of z-value maps among the three groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc t tests with age and duration of illness as covariates of no interest. RESULTS: Relative to healthy comparison subjects, both patient groups showed significantly reduced connectivity in prefrontal-limbic-thalamic areas bilaterally. However, the nonrefractory group showed a more distributed decrease in connectivity than the refractory group, especially in the anterior cingulate cortex and in the amygdala, hippocampus, and insula bilaterally; in contrast, the refractory group showed disrupted functional connectivity mainly in prefrontal areas and in thalamus areas bilaterally. CONCLUSIONS:Refractory depression is associated with disrupted functional connectivity mainly in thalamo-cortical circuits, while nonrefractory depression is associated with more distributed decreased connectivity in the limbic-striatal-pallidal-thalamic circuit. These results suggest that nonrefractory and refractory depression are characterized by distinct functional deficits in distributed brain networks.
Authors: Valentin Riedl; Lukas Utz; Gabriel Castrillón; Timo Grimmer; Josef P Rauschecker; Markus Ploner; Karl J Friston; Alexander Drzezga; Christian Sorg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Howard J Aizenstein; Alexander Khalaf; Sarah E Walker; Carmen Andreescu Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Mary L Phillips; Henry W Chase; Yvette I Sheline; Amit Etkin; Jorge R C Almeida; Thilo Deckersbach; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2015-02-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: S Lui; L Yao; Y Xiao; S K Keedy; J L Reilly; R S Keefe; C A Tamminga; M S Keshavan; G D Pearlson; Q Gong; J A Sweeney Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Tiffany C Ho; Colm G Connolly; Eva Henje Blom; Kaja Z LeWinn; Irina A Strigo; Martin P Paulus; Guido Frank; Jeffrey E Max; Jing Wu; Melanie Chan; Susan F Tapert; Alan N Simmons; Tony T Yang Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 13.382