AIMS: To examine the diagnostic accuracy of sensitive cardiac troponin (cTn) assays in elderly patients, since elevated levels with sensitive cTn assays were reported in 20% of elderly patients without acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multi-centre study, we included 1098 consecutive patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AMI, 406 (37%) were >70 years old. Measurement of three investigational sensitive cTn assays [Roche high-sensitive cTnT (hs-cTnT), Siemens cTnI-Ultra, and Abbott-Architect cTnI) and the standard assay (Roche cTnT) was performed in a blinded fashion. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists. Acute myocardial infarction was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 24% of elderly patients. Among elderly patients without AMI, baseline cTn levels were elevated above the 99th percentile in 51% with Roche hs-cTnT, in 17% with Siemens TnI-Ultra, and 13% with Abbott-Architect cTnI. The diagnostic accuracy as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was significantly greater for the sensitive cTn assays compared with the standard assay (AUC for Roche hs-cTnT, 0.94; Siemens cTnI-Ultra, 0.95; and Abbott-Architect cTnI, 0.95 vs. AUC for the standard assay, 0.90; P < 0.05 for comparisons). The best cut-offs for the sensitive cTn-assays determined by the ROC-curve in elderly patients differed clearly from those in younger patients. Furthermore, the prognostic value regarding 90-day mortality varied among the sensitive cTn assays. CONCLUSION: Sensitive cTn assays have high diagnostic accuracy also in the elderly. Mild elevations are common in elderly non-AMI patients, therefore the optimal cut-off levels are substantially higher in elderly as compared with younger patients. Furthermore, sensitive cTn assays yielded different prognostic value.
AIMS: To examine the diagnostic accuracy of sensitive cardiac troponin (cTn) assays in elderly patients, since elevated levels with sensitive cTn assays were reported in 20% of elderly patients without acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multi-centre study, we included 1098 consecutive patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AMI, 406 (37%) were >70 years old. Measurement of three investigational sensitive cTn assays [Roche high-sensitive cTnT (hs-cTnT), Siemens cTnI-Ultra, and Abbott-Architect cTnI) and the standard assay (Roche cTnT) was performed in a blinded fashion. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists. Acute myocardial infarction was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 24% of elderly patients. Among elderly patients without AMI, baseline cTn levels were elevated above the 99th percentile in 51% with Roche hs-cTnT, in 17% with Siemens TnI-Ultra, and 13% with Abbott-Architect cTnI. The diagnostic accuracy as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was significantly greater for the sensitive cTn assays compared with the standard assay (AUC for Roche hs-cTnT, 0.94; Siemens cTnI-Ultra, 0.95; and Abbott-Architect cTnI, 0.95 vs. AUC for the standard assay, 0.90; P < 0.05 for comparisons). The best cut-offs for the sensitive cTn-assays determined by the ROC-curve in elderly patients differed clearly from those in younger patients. Furthermore, the prognostic value regarding 90-day mortality varied among the sensitive cTn assays. CONCLUSION: Sensitive cTn assays have high diagnostic accuracy also in the elderly. Mild elevations are common in elderly non-AMI patients, therefore the optimal cut-off levels are substantially higher in elderly as compared with younger patients. Furthermore, sensitive cTn assays yielded different prognostic value.
Authors: Tobias Reichlin; Raphael Twerenbold; Karin Wildi; Maria Rubini Gimenez; Nathalie Bergsma; Philip Haaf; Sophie Druey; Christian Puelacher; Berit Moehring; Michael Freese; Claudia Stelzig; Lian Krivoshei; Petra Hillinger; Cedric Jäger; Thomas Herrmann; Philip Kreutzinger; Milos Radosavac; Zoraida Moreno Weidmann; Kateryna Pershyna; Ursina Honegger; Max Wagener; Thierry Vuillomenet; Isabel Campodarve; Roland Bingisser; Òscar Miró; Katharina Rentsch; Stefano Bassetti; Stefan Osswald; Christian Mueller Journal: CMAJ Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Dirk Westermann; Johannes Tobias Neumann; Nils Arne Sörensen; Stefan Blankenberg Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Ivo Strebel; Raphael Twerenbold; Jasper Boeddinghaus; Roger Abächerli; Maria Rubini Giménez; Karin Wildi; Karin Grimm; Christian Puelacher; Patrick Badertscher; Zaid Sabti; Dominik Breitenbücher; Janina Jann; Farah Selman; Jeanne du Fay de Lavallaz; Nicolas Schaerli; Thomas Nestelberger; Claudia Stelzig; Michael Freese; Lukas Schumacher; Stefan Osswald; Christian Mueller; Tobias Reichlin Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2018-02-24 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Jonathan Hinton; Mark Mariathas; Lavinia Gabara; Zoe Nicholas; Rick Allan; Sanjay Ramamoorthy; Mamas A Mamas; Michael Mahmoudi; Paul Cook; Nick Curzen Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 2.659