| Literature DB >> 21360193 |
Dietmar Breuer1, Jens-Uwe Hahn, Dieter Höber, Christoph Emmel, Uwe Musanke, Reinhold Rühl, Anne Spickenheuer, Monika Raulf-Heimsoth, Rainer Bramer, Albrecht Seidel, Bernd Schilling, Evelyn Heinze, Benjamin Kendzia, Boleslaw Marczynski, Peter Welge, Jürgen Angerer, Thomas Brüning, Beate Pesch.
Abstract
The chemical complexity of emissions from bitumen applications is a challenge in the assessment of exposure. Personal sampling of vapours and aerosols of bitumen was organized in 320 bitumen-exposed workers and 69 non-exposed construction workers during 2001-2008. Area sampling was conducted at 44 construction sites. Area and personal sampling of vapours and aerosols of bitumen showed similar concentrations between 5 and 10 mg/m(3), while area sampling yielded higher concentrations above the former occupational exposure limit (OEL) of 10 mg/m(3). The median concentration of personal bitumen exposure was 3.46 mg/m(3) (inter-quartile range 1.80-5.90 mg/m(3)). Only few workers were exposed above the former OEL. The specificity of the method measuring C-H stretch vibration is limited. This accounts for a median background level of 0.20 mg/m³ in non-exposed workers which is likely due to ubiquitous aliphatic hydrocarbons. Further, area measurements of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were taken at 25 construction sites. U.S. EPA PAHs were determined with GC/MS, with the result of a median concentration of 2.47 μg/m(3) at 15 mastic asphalt worksites associated with vapours and aerosols of bitumen, with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.45 (95% CI -0.13 to 0.78). PAH exposure at mastic-asphalt works was higher than at reference worksites (median 0.21 μg/m(3)), but about one order of magnitude lower compared to coke-oven works. For a comparison of concentrations of vapours and aerosols of bitumen and PAHs in asphalt works, differences in sampling and analytical methods must to be taken into account.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21360193 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-011-0678-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Toxicol ISSN: 0340-5761 Impact factor: 5.153