Anne Lotz1, Beate Pesch1, Gerhard Dettbarn2, Monika Raulf1, Peter Welge1, Hans-Peter Rihs1, Dietmar Breuer3, Stefan Gabriel3, Jens-Uwe Hahn3, Thomas Brüning1, Albrecht Seidel4. 1. Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr-Universität Bochum (IPA), Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany. 2. Biochemical Institute for Environmental Carcinogens, Prof. Dr. Gernot Grimmer-Foundation, Lurup 4, 22927, Grosshansdorf, Germany. 3. Institute for Occupational Safety of the German Social Accident Insurance (IFA), Alte Heerstraße 111, 53757, Sankt Augustin, Germany. 4. Biochemical Institute for Environmental Carcinogens, Prof. Dr. Gernot Grimmer-Foundation, Lurup 4, 22927, Grosshansdorf, Germany. albrecht.seidel@biu-grimmer.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study investigates the diol epoxide pathway of phenanthrene (PHE) together with phenolic metabolites of PHE and pyrene (PYR) in workers with and without exposure to bitumen fumes. METHODS: The metabolite concentrations were determined in urine samples collected from 91 mastic asphalt workers and 42 construction workers as reference group before and after shift. During shift, vapours and aerosols of bitumen were measured according to a German protocol in the workers' breathing zone. RESULTS: The median concentration of vapours and aerosols of bitumen in mastic asphalt workers was 6.3 mg/m3. Metabolite concentrations were highest in post-shift urines of smokers with bitumen exposure and showed an increase during shift. The Spearman correlations between the creatinine-adjusted concentrations of metabolites and vapours and aerosols of bitumen in non-smokers were weak (e.g. sum of Di-OH-PYR: 0.28) or negligible (e.g. 1,2-PHE-diol: 0.08; PHE-tetrol: 0.12). Metabolites from the diol epoxide pathway of PHE were excreted in higher concentrations than phenolic metabolites (post-shift, non-smoking asphalt workers: 1,2-PHE-diol 2.59 µg/g crea vs. sum of all OH-PHE 1.87 µg/g crea). 1,2-PHE-diol was weakly correlated with PHE-tetrol (Spearman coefficient 0.30), an endpoint of the diol epoxide pathway. By contrast, we found a close correlation between the sum of 1,6-DiOH-PYR and 1,8-DiOH-PYR with 1-OH-PYR (Spearman coefficient 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Most urinary PAH metabolites were higher after shift in bitumen-exposed workers, although the association with bitumen was weak or negligible likely due to the small PAH content. The additional metabolites of PHE and PYR complete the picture of the complex metabolic pathways. Nevertheless, none of the PAH metabolites can be considered to be a specific biomarker for bitumen exposure.
PURPOSE: This study investigates the diol epoxide pathway of phenanthrene (PHE) together with phenolic metabolites of PHE and pyrene (PYR) in workers with and without exposure to bitumen fumes. METHODS: The metabolite concentrations were determined in urine samples collected from 91 mastic asphalt workers and 42 construction workers as reference group before and after shift. During shift, vapours and aerosols of bitumen were measured according to a German protocol in the workers' breathing zone. RESULTS: The median concentration of vapours and aerosols of bitumen in mastic asphalt workers was 6.3 mg/m3. Metabolite concentrations were highest in post-shift urines of smokers with bitumen exposure and showed an increase during shift. The Spearman correlations between the creatinine-adjusted concentrations of metabolites and vapours and aerosols of bitumen in non-smokers were weak (e.g. sum of Di-OH-PYR: 0.28) or negligible (e.g. 1,2-PHE-diol: 0.08; PHE-tetrol: 0.12). Metabolites from the diol epoxide pathway of PHE were excreted in higher concentrations than phenolic metabolites (post-shift, non-smoking asphalt workers: 1,2-PHE-diol 2.59 µg/g crea vs. sum of all OH-PHE 1.87 µg/g crea). 1,2-PHE-diol was weakly correlated with PHE-tetrol (Spearman coefficient 0.30), an endpoint of the diol epoxide pathway. By contrast, we found a close correlation between the sum of 1,6-DiOH-PYR and 1,8-DiOH-PYR with 1-OH-PYR (Spearman coefficient 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Most urinary PAH metabolites were higher after shift in bitumen-exposed workers, although the association with bitumen was weak or negligible likely due to the small PAH content. The additional metabolites of PHE and PYR complete the picture of the complex metabolic pathways. Nevertheless, none of the PAH metabolites can be considered to be a specific biomarker for bitumen exposure.
Authors: Yan Zhong; Steven G Carmella; Pramod Upadhyaya; J Bradley Hochalter; Diane Rauch; Andrew Oliver; Joni Jensen; Dorothy Hatsukami; Jing Wang; Cheryl Zimmerman; Stephen S Hecht Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2010-12-27 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Stephen S Hecht; Menglan Chen; Andrea Yoder; Joni Jensen; Dorothy Hatsukami; Chap Le; Steven G Carmella Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: B Järvholm; G Nordström; B Högstedt; J O Levin; J Wahlström; C Ostman; C Bergendahl Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: J Jacob; G Raab; V Soballa; W A Schmalix; G Grimmer; H Greim; J Doehmer; A Seidel Journal: Environ Toxicol Pharmacol Date: 1996-02-15 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Hans-Peter Rihs; Beate Pesch; Martin Kappler; Sylvia Rabstein; Bernd Rossbach; Jürgen Angerer; Michael Scherenberg; Ansgar Adams; Michael Wilhelm; Albrecht Seidel; Thomas Brüning Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 2005-04-08 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: Stephen S Hecht; J Bradley Hochalter; Steven G Carmella; Yan Zhang; Diane M Rauch; Naomi Fujioka; Joni Jensen; Dorothy K Hatsukami Journal: Biomarkers Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 2.658
Authors: Zheng Li; Courtney D Sandau; Lovisa C Romanoff; Samuel P Caudill; Andreas Sjodin; Larry L Needham; Donald G Patterson Journal: Environ Res Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: H Glatt; C Wameling; S Elsberg; H Thomas; H Marquardt; A Hewer; D H Phillips; F Oesch; A Seidel Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 1993-01 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Dana B Barr; Lynn C Wilder; Samuel P Caudill; Amanda J Gonzalez; Lance L Needham; James L Pirkle Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Angelina Pena; Sofia Duarte; André M P T Pereira; Liliana J G Silva; Célia S M Laranjeiro; Marta Oliveira; Celeste Lino; Simone Morais Journal: Molecules Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Henriqueta Louro; Bruno Costa Gomes; Anne Thoustrup Saber; Anna Laura Iamiceli; Thomas Göen; Kate Jones; Andromachi Katsonouri; Christiana M Neophytou; Ulla Vogel; Célia Ventura; Axel Oberemm; Radu Corneliu Duca; Mariana F Fernandez; Nicolas Olea; Tiina Santonen; Susana Viegas; Maria João Silva Journal: Toxics Date: 2022-08-17