BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABGS), occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in the postoperative period and is associated with increased morbidity with longer intensive unit care (ICU) and hospital stay. Prevention with antiarrhythmic drugs is of limited success and associated with significant side effects. Therefore alternative approaches, such as Bachmann Bundle pacing, are required. METHODS AND RESULTS:154 consecutive patients, meanage 58±8.8 years, including 134 males and 20 females, were randomized to three groups; Group I : No pacing n= 54, Group II : RA pacing n= 52, Group III : Bachmann Bundle pacing n= 48. All the groups were well matched with regard to age, left atrial size, ejection fraction and use of beta blockers. Patients in Groups II and III were continually paced at a rate of 100 beats per minute (bpm) or at 10 bpm more than patients' intrinsic heart rate. All the patients were monitored for 72 hours by telemetry and occurrence of AF was noted. Incidence of AF was 0% (none of 48 patients) in Group III as compared to 16.6% in Group I (9 of 54 patients) (p 0.003) and 12.5% in Group II (5 of 52 patients) (p 0.03). There was a trend towards shorter ICU stay in Group III (3.9 days) as compared to Group II (4.5 days) and Group I (4.1 days). Among the three groups, the reduction in mean P wave duration also was greater in Bachmann bundle paced group. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing CABGS, Bachmann bundle pacing is superior to right atrial / no pacing in the post operative period for preventing occurrence of AF and reducing ICU stay, commensurate with a reduction in mean P wave duration on surface ECG.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABGS), occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in the postoperative period and is associated with increased morbidity with longer intensive unit care (ICU) and hospital stay. Prevention with antiarrhythmic drugs is of limited success and associated with significant side effects. Therefore alternative approaches, such as Bachmann Bundle pacing, are required. METHODS AND RESULTS: 154 consecutive patients, mean age 58±8.8 years, including 134 males and 20 females, were randomized to three groups; Group I : No pacing n= 54, Group II : RA pacing n= 52, Group III : Bachmann Bundle pacing n= 48. All the groups were well matched with regard to age, left atrial size, ejection fraction and use of beta blockers. Patients in Groups II and III were continually paced at a rate of 100 beats per minute (bpm) or at 10 bpm more than patients' intrinsic heart rate. All the patients were monitored for 72 hours by telemetry and occurrence of AF was noted. Incidence of AF was 0% (none of 48 patients) in Group III as compared to 16.6% in Group I (9 of 54 patients) (p 0.003) and 12.5% in Group II (5 of 52 patients) (p 0.03). There was a trend towards shorter ICU stay in Group III (3.9 days) as compared to Group II (4.5 days) and Group I (4.1 days). Among the three groups, the reduction in mean P wave duration also was greater in Bachmann bundle paced group. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing CABGS, Bachmann bundle pacing is superior to right atrial / no pacing in the post operative period for preventing occurrence of AF and reducing ICU stay, commensurate with a reduction in mean P wave duration on surface ECG.
Authors: Andreas Goette; Joerg Mittag; Andrea Friedl; Henning Busk; Marilene S Jepsen; Wolfgang M Hartung; Christof Huth; Helmut U Klein Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: G J Taylor; S A Malik; J A Colliver; J T Dove; H W Moses; F L Mikell; J E Batchelder; J A Schneider; H A Wellons Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1987-10-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: E P Gerstenfeld; M R Hill; S N French; R Mehra; K Rofino; T J Vander Salm; R S Mittleman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R L Wolman; N A Nussmeier; A Aggarwal; M S Kanchuger; G W Roach; M F Newman; C M Mangano; K E Marschall; C Ley; D M Boisvert; G M Ozanne; A Herskowitz; S H Graham; D T Mangano Journal: Stroke Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: S Garrigue; S S Barold; S Cazeau; L Gencel; P Jaïs; M Haissaguerre; J Clémenty Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 1.976