Literature DB >> 21358468

The state of lumbar fusion extenders.

Kalil G Abdullah1, Michael P Steinmetz, Edward C Benzel, Thomas E Mroz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Review of literature.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the available literature supporting the use of lumbar fusion extenders in clinical practice. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Because of the morbidity associated with the harvest of autologous iliac crest bone grafts, the search for lumber fusion extenders and replacements has accelerated. Many formulations of lumbar fusion extenders have been developed, and it is essential to evaluate clinical literature and available outcome metrics of these extenders.
METHODS: A review of English-language literature was performed between 1990 and January of 2010 for all literature presenting clinical outcomes of lumbar fusion extenders. After controlling for inclusion and exclusion criteria and assigning levels of evidence, 19 clinical studies were fully reviewed including those for demineralized bone matrix, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2), β-tricalcium phosphate, and calcium sulfate.
RESULTS: The most extensively studied of the lumbar fusion extenders is β-tricalcium phosphate, especially with regard to its use in adolescent scoliosis correction. The use of rhBMP-2 and demineralized bone matrix is supported only by two and three clinical studies, respectively. Calcium sulfate and other miscellaneous extenders are not conclusively or consistently supported by available clinical studies.
CONCLUSION: Calcium phosphate is the most supported of the lumbar fusion extenders. rhBMP-2 and demineralized bone matrix are supported by smaller bodies of evidence. These formulations are supported by these initial studies but in some cases need to be better examined with regard to side effect profiles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21358468     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318209952b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anthony Minh Tien Chau; Lileane Liang Xu; Johnny Ho-Yin Wong; Ralph Jasper Mobbs
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Mesenchymal stem cells derived from vertebrae (vMSCs) show best biological properties.

Authors:  Giovanni Barbanti Brodano; Silvia Terzi; Luisa Trombi; Cristiana Griffoni; Mauro Valtieri; Stefano Boriani; Maria Cristina Magli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Growth factors in orthopaedic surgery: demineralized bone matrix versus recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins.

Authors:  Maurice Hinsenkamp; Jean-Francois Collard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The concern on clinical use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2011-07

5.  Biomechanics of disc degeneration.

Authors:  V Palepu; M Kodigudla; V K Goel
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-06-17

6.  Prospective analysis of a new bone graft in lumbar interbody fusion: results of a 2- year prospective clinical and radiological study.

Authors:  Philippe Lauweryns; Yannic Raskin
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-02-03

Review 7.  Allograft Versus Demineralized Bone Matrix in Instrumented and Noninstrumented Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zorica Buser; Darrel S Brodke; Jim A Youssef; Elke Rometsch; Jong-Beom Park; S Tim Yoon; Jeffrey C Wang; Hans-Joerg Meisel
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-10-25

8.  Surgical outcomes of two kinds of demineralized bone matrix putties/local autograft composites in instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Dong-Gune Chang; Jong-Beom Park; Yangjun Han
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.