Literature DB >> 21358301

The effect of prolonged fixation on the immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression in invasive breast cancer: a prospective study.

Leung Chu Tong1, Nahid Nelson, Jim Tsourigiannis, Anna Marie Mulligan.   

Abstract

Expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is important in predicting a response to targeted therapies in breast cancer. Immunohistochemical assays to determine hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status must therefore be accurate and reproducible. Tissue fixation has been shown to play a crucial role in determining consistency in quality. Although guidelines impose upper limits for the fixation period, the data on which these limits are based are scant. This study aimed to prospectively examine the effect of fixation of >72 hours on these assays. In 101 invasive breast cancer samples, HR and HER2 status was compared between tumor blocks undergoing a short fixation period with those undergoing a period of prolonged fixation (PF). Discordances were classified as an incremental change between categories of (i) a single order of magnitude, that is a difference in the status of low positive (Allred score 3) compared with positive (Allred score 4 to 8) or negative (Allred score 0 or 2) and vice versa for HRs and a difference in HER2 status of equivocal compared with negative or positive and vice versa or (ii) greater than a single order of magnitude, that is a difference in the status of positive compared with negative or vice versa. The median fixation time for the short fixation group was 13 hours and 18 minutes (mean, 13 h 17 min; range, 10 h 33 min to 17 h 45 min) and for the PF group was 79 hours 22 minutes (mean, 79 h 35 min; range, 73 h 33 min to 102 h 30 min). Eight cases showed discordances, all of which were of a single order of magnitude including 1 for ER, 5 for PR, and 2 for HER2. In 6 of these, a higher score was seen in the PF group. In conclusion, fixation for limited periods beyond 72 hours does not result in a reduction in assay sensitivity in the determination of ER, PR, or HER2 immunohistochemical status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21358301     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31820e6237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  20 in total

1.  The use of mouse models of breast cancer and quantitative image analysis to evaluate hormone receptor antigenicity after microwave-assisted formalin fixation.

Authors:  Jesse A Engelberg; Richard T Giberson; Lawrence J T Young; Neil E Hubbard; Robert D Cardiff
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  The effect of prolonged cold ischemia time on estrogen receptor immunohistochemistry in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoxian Li; Michael T Deavers; Ming Guo; Ping Liu; Yun Gong; Constance T Albarracin; Lavinia P Middleton; Lei Huo
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Evaluation of three commercial progesterone receptor assays in a single tamoxifen-treated breast cancer cohort.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Kornaga; Alexander C Klimowicz; Natalia Guggisberg; Travis Ogilvie; Don G Morris; Marc Webster; Anthony M Magliocco
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  A systematic comparison of three commercial estrogen receptor assays in a single clinical outcome breast cancer cohort.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Kornaga; Alexander C Klimowicz; Natalia Guggisberg; Travis Ogilvie; Don G Morris; Marc Webster; Anthony M Magliocco
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Testing for her2 in breast cancer: current pathology challenges faced in Canada.

Authors:  W Hanna; P Barnes; R Berendt; M Chang; A Magliocco; A M Mulligan; H Rees; N Miller; L Elavathil; B Gilks; N Pettigrew; D Pilavdzic; S Sengupta
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Quality assessment of HER2 testing by monitoring of positivity rates.

Authors:  Harald Choritz; Guntram Büsche; Hans Kreipe
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  Epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemistry: new opportunities in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryan A Hutchinson; Richard A Adams; Darragh G McArt; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Bharat Jasani; Peter W Hamilton
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  HER2 status determination: analyzing the problems to find the solutions.

Authors:  Irene Terrenato; Ilaria Pennacchia; Simonetta Buglioni; Marcella Mottolese; Vincenzo Arena
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David G Hicks; Mitch Dowsett; Lisa M McShane; Kimberly H Allison; Donald C Allred; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Pamela B Mangu; Soonmyung Paik; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 10.  Immunohistochemical Markers of Soft Tissue Tumors: Pathologic Diagnosis, Genetic Contributions, and Therapeutic Options.

Authors:  David M Parham
Journal:  Anal Chem Insights       Date:  2015-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.