Literature DB >> 21358207

Prospective multicenter randomized phase III study of weekly versus standard docetaxel (D2) for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Hans-Joachim Stemmler1, Nadia Harbeck, Isolde Gröll de Rivera, Ursula Vehling Kaiser, Gerhard Rauthe, Wolfgang Abenhardt, Almut Artmann, Harald Sommer, Hans-Gerd Meerpohl, Marion Kiechle, Volker Heinemann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous phase II studies have indicated a greatly reduced hematotoxicity of docetaxel-based regimens administered on weekly schedules. The present trial was initiated to randomly compare the toxicity and efficacy of weekly docetaxel versus its standard 3-weekly application.
METHODS: Patients previously untreated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease were recruited. Patients aged >60 years or with a Karnofsky Perfomance Status (KPS) of 60-80% were eligible for the D2 study. Patients were randomized to receive docetaxel either on a 3-weekly [75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (q3w)] or on a weekly (30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15; q4w) schedule. Treatment was continued until a maximum of 8 cycles, unacceptable toxicity, or disease progression. All patients received standard corticosteroid prophylaxis.
RESULTS: Since statistical significance for the primary endpoint (toxicity) was achieved in the interim analysis, the study was closed according to the study protocol (102 of 162 patients). Compared to the standard arm, leukopenia ≥grade 3 was a rare event in the weekly arm of the D2 study (per-patient analysis: 4.2% q1w vs. 51.9% q3w; p < 0.0001). No difference was observed between the 2 schedules regarding the occurrence of anemia or thrombocytopenia. With regard to nonhematological toxicity, there was a higher incidence of skin/nail and hepatological toxicity with the weekly schedule, whereas neurotoxicity was observed more often in the standard arm. The rate of omitted doses was significantly increased in the weekly arm (8.6% q1w vs. 0% q3w). The overall response rate was 22.9% in the weekly arm compared to 42.6% in the standard arm (p = 0.039). Time to progression was 5.4 (q1w) versus 6.3 (q3w) months (p = 0.91), and overall survival was 22.7 (q1w) versus 15.8 (q3w) months (p = 0.24).
CONCLUSION: The present data support the feasibility of both weekly and 3-weekly application of docetaxel. As expected, severe leukopenia seems avoidable in weekly scheduled single-agent docetaxel and may serve as an important treatment option, particularly in elderly patients and patients with a reduced performance status.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21358207     DOI: 10.1159/000320640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  9 in total

1.  β3-tubulin is a good predictor of sensitivity to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Youqun Xiang; Yinlong Yang; Guilong Guo; Xiaoqu Hu; Huxiang Zhang; Xiaohua Zhang; Yifei Pan
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with non-hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  David J Kuter
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 11.047

3.  Docetaxel-induced skin toxicities in breast cancer patients subsequent to paclitaxel shortage: a case series and literature review.

Authors:  Ming J Poi; Michael Berger; Maryam Lustberg; Rachel Layman; Charles L Shapiro; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy; Ewa Mrozek; Erin Olson; Robert Wesolowski
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Presentation and management of docetaxel-related adverse effects in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Maria Y Ho; John R Mackey
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Chemotherapy in frail elderly patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: A "real world" experience.

Authors:  Paolo Tralongo; Sebastiano Bordonaro; Annamaria Di Mari; Francesco Cappuccio; Sebastiano Rametta Giuliano
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2016-01-21

Review 6.  'Who', 'when' and 'how' in re-irradiation of recurrent painful bone metastases.

Authors:  Florence Mok; Kenneth Li; Rebecca Yeung; Kam-Hung Wong; Brian Yu; Erin Wong; Gillian Bedard; Edward Chow
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.072

7.  No relation between docetaxel administration route and high-grade diarrhea incidence.

Authors:  Jeroen J M A Hendrikx; Frederik E Stuurman; Ji-Ying Song; Vincent A de Weger; Jurjen S Lagas; Hilde Rosing; Jos H Beijnen; Alfred H Schinkel; Jan H M Schellens; Serena Marchetti
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2020-08

8.  Use of Taxanes in Metastatic HER2-negative Breast Cancer - a Status Report.

Authors:  Oleg Gluz; Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke; Frederik Marmé; Marc Thill
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Pharmacokinetics and Toxicities of Oral Docetaxel Formulations Co-Administered with Ritonavir in Phase I Trials.

Authors:  Marit Vermunt; Serena Marchetti; Jos Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.