Literature DB >> 21357949

Survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.

W van der Weegen1, H J Hoekstra, T Sijbesma, E Bos, E H Schemitsch, R W Poolman.   

Abstract

We systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature to relate the survival of hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty devices to a National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) benchmark for choosing a primary total hip replacement, which is a survival rate of 90% at a follow-up of ten years. A total of 29 articles (10 621 resurfaced hips) met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up ranged from 0.6 to 10.5 years and the survival of the implant ranged from 84% to 100%. Of the 10 621 hips, 370 were revised (3.5%), with aseptic loosening as the most frequent mode of failure. None of the hip resurfacing arthroplasty implants used to date met the full ten-year NICE benchmark of survival. A total of 13 studies showed satisfactory survival compared with the three-year NICE benchmark.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21357949     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  13 in total

Review 1.  Surgical management of hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; Anthony V Perruccio; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head-a current review.

Authors:  Todd P Pierce; Randa K Elmallah; Julio J Jauregui; Daniel F Verna; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-09

3.  Do survival rate and serum ion concentrations 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing provide evidence for continued use?

Authors:  Albrecht Hartmann; Jörg Lützner; Stephan Kirschner; Wolf-Christoph Witzleb; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.

Authors:  S Sehatzadeh; K Kaulback; L Levin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-08-01

Review 5.  Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Karen Pykerman; Jason Werle; Diane Lorenzetti; Tracy Wasylak; Tom Noseworthy; Donald A Dick; Greg O'Connor; Aish Sundaram; Sanne Heintzbergen; Cy Frank
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The outcomes of hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty in Men.

Authors:  Kimona Issa; Amanda Palich; Tiffany Tatevossian; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Qais Naziri; Michael A Mont
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system.

Authors:  Walter van der Weegen; Henk J Hoekstra; Thea Sijbesma; Shennah Austen; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Long - term survivorship and clinical results of the navigated withdrawn ASR ™.

Authors:  Johannes H M van Ochten; Dariusch Arbab; Peer Eysel; Dietmar P König
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-16

9.  Similar range of motion and function after resurfacing large-head or standard total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeannette Østergaard Penny; Ole Ovesen; Jens-Erik Varmarken; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  Have the media influenced the use of hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A review of UK print media.

Authors:  A Malviya; G H Stafford; R J F Villar; R N Villar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.