Literature DB >> 21355742

Investigation of the use of three electroencephalographic electrodes for long-term electroencephalographic recording in awake and sedated dogs.

Fiona M K James1, Dana G Allen, Alexa M E Bersenas, W Larry Grovum, Carolyn L Kerr, Gabrielle Monteith, Joane M Parent, Roberto Poma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare electroencephalography (EEG) artifact associated with use of the subdermal wire electrode (SWE), gold cup electrode (GCE), and subdermal needle electrode (SNE) over an 8-hour period in sedated and awake dogs. ANIMALS: 6 healthy dogs. PROCEDURES: 8 EEG channels were recorded during 20-minute video-EEG recording sessions (intermittently at 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours) with and without chlorpromazine sedation. Nonphysiologic artifacts were identified. Duration of artifact was summed for each channel. Number of unaffected channels (NUC) was determined.
RESULTS: NUC was significantly affected by electrode type and sedation over time; median for SWE (2.80 channels; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 5.70 channels) was significantly different from medians for GCE (7.87 channels; 95% CI, 7.44 to 7.94 channels) and SNE (7.60 channels; 95% CI, 6.61 to 7.89 channels). After 4 hours, NUC decreased in awake dogs, regardless of electrode type. In awake dogs, duration of artifact differed significantly between SWE and GCE or SNE; medians at 8 hours were 61.55 seconds (95% CI, 21.81 to 173.65 seconds), 1.33 seconds (95% CI, 0.47 to 3.75 seconds), and 21.01 seconds (95% CI, 6.85 to 64.42 seconds), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The SWE had a significant duration of artifact during recording periods > 2 hours, compared with results for the GCE and SNE, in awake dogs. The GCE, SNE, and sedation resulted in significantly more channels unaffected by artifact. For longer recordings, caution should be exercised in selecting EEG electrodes and sedation state, although differences among electrodes may not be clinically relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21355742     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.72.3.384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  5 in total

1.  Generalized myoclonic epilepsy with photosensitivity in juvenile dogs caused by a defective DIRAS family GTPase 1.

Authors:  Franziska Wielaender; Riika Sarviaho; Fiona James; Marjo K Hytönen; Miguel A Cortez; Gerhard Kluger; Lotta L E Koskinen; Meharji Arumilli; Marion Kornberg; Andrea Bathen-Noethen; Andrea Tipold; Kai Rentmeister; Sofie F M Bhatti; Velia Hülsmeyer; Irene C Boettcher; Carina Tästensen; Thomas Flegel; Elisabeth Dietschi; Tosso Leeb; Kaspar Matiasek; Andrea Fischer; Hannes Lohi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The Prospects of Non-EEG Seizure Detection Devices in Dogs.

Authors:  Jos Bongers; Rodrigo Gutierrez-Quintana; Catherine Elizabeth Stalin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Diagnostic Utility of Wireless Video-Electroencephalography in Unsedated Dogs.

Authors:  F M K James; M A Cortez; G Monteith; T S Jokinen; S Sanders; F Wielaender; A Fischer; H Lohi
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Light-cured polymer electrodes for non-invasive EEG recordings.

Authors:  Nora Vanessa de Camp; Gerhard Kalinka; Jürgen Bergeler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Influence of Stainless Needle Electrodes and Silver Disk Electrodes over the Interhemispheric Cerebral Coherence Value in Vigil Dogs.

Authors:  Mihai Musteata; Denis Gabriel Borcea; Raluca Ștefănescu; Gheorghe Solcan; Radu Lăcătuș
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.