PURPOSE: We compared the efficacy of human Langerhans cells (LC) as tumor immunogens in vivo with monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDC) and investigated how interleukin 15 (IL15) supports optimal DC-stimulated antitumor immunity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III/IV melanoma patients participated in this first clinical trial comparing melanoma peptide-pulsed LC with moDC vaccines (NCT00700167, www.ClinicalTrials.gov). Correlative studies evaluated mechanisms mediating IL15 support of DC-stimulated antitumor immunity. RESULTS: Both DC vaccines were safe and immunogenic for melanoma antigens. LC-based vaccines stimulated significantly greater tyrosinase-HLA-A*0201 tetramer reactivity than the moDC-based vaccines. The two DC subtypes were otherwise statistically comparable, in contrast to extensive prior data in vitro showing LC superiority. LCs synthesize much more IL15 than moDCs and stimulate significantly more antigen-specific lymphocytes with a cytolytic IFN-γ profile even without exogenous IL15. When supplemented by low-dose IL15, instead of IL2, moDCs stimulate 5 to 6 logs more tumor antigen-specific effector memory T cells (T(EMRA)) over 3 to 4 weeks in vitro. IL2 and IL15 can be synergistic in moDC stimulation of cytolytic T cells. IL15 promotes T-cell expression of the antiapoptotic bcl-2 and inhibits candidate regulatory T-cell (Treg) expansion after DC stimulation, countering two effects of IL2 that do not foster tumor immunity. CONCLUSIONS: MoDC-based vaccines will require exogenous IL15 to achieve clinical efficacy. Alternatively, LCs can couple the endogenous production of IL15 with potent T-cell stimulatory activity. Optimization of full-length tumor antigen expression for processing into multiple immunogenic peptides for presentation by both class I and II MHC therefore merits emphasis to support more effective antitumor immunity stimulated by LCs.
PURPOSE: We compared the efficacy of human Langerhans cells (LC) as tumor immunogens in vivo with monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDC) and investigated how interleukin 15 (IL15) supports optimal DC-stimulated antitumor immunity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III/IV melanomapatients participated in this first clinical trial comparing melanoma peptide-pulsed LC with moDC vaccines (NCT00700167, www.ClinicalTrials.gov). Correlative studies evaluated mechanisms mediating IL15 support of DC-stimulated antitumor immunity. RESULTS: Both DC vaccines were safe and immunogenic for melanoma antigens. LC-based vaccines stimulated significantly greater tyrosinase-HLA-A*0201 tetramer reactivity than the moDC-based vaccines. The two DC subtypes were otherwise statistically comparable, in contrast to extensive prior data in vitro showing LC superiority. LCs synthesize much more IL15 than moDCs and stimulate significantly more antigen-specific lymphocytes with a cytolytic IFN-γ profile even without exogenous IL15. When supplemented by low-dose IL15, instead of IL2, moDCs stimulate 5 to 6 logs more tumor antigen-specific effector memory T cells (T(EMRA)) over 3 to 4 weeks in vitro. IL2 and IL15 can be synergistic in moDC stimulation of cytolytic T cells. IL15 promotes T-cell expression of the antiapoptotic bcl-2 and inhibits candidate regulatory T-cell (Treg) expansion after DC stimulation, countering two effects of IL2 that do not foster tumor immunity. CONCLUSIONS: MoDC-based vaccines will require exogenous IL15 to achieve clinical efficacy. Alternatively, LCs can couple the endogenous production of IL15 with potent T-cell stimulatory activity. Optimization of full-length tumor antigen expression for processing into multiple immunogenic peptides for presentation by both class I and II MHC therefore merits emphasis to support more effective antitumor immunity stimulated by LCs.
Authors: Gudrun Ratzinger; Jan Baggers; Maria A de Cos; Jianda Yuan; Tao Dao; John L Reagan; Christian Münz; Glenn Heller; James W Young Journal: J Immunol Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: SangKon Oh; Liyanage P Perera; Donald S Burke; Thomas A Waldmann; Jay A Berzofsky Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-10-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christopher A Klebanoff; Luca Gattinoni; Parizad Torabi-Parizi; Keith Kerstann; Adela R Cardones; Steven E Finkelstein; Douglas C Palmer; Paul A Antony; Sam T Hwang; Steven A Rosenberg; Thomas A Waldmann; Nicholas P Restifo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-06-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Holden T Maecker; James Moon; Sonny Bhatia; Smita A Ghanekar; Vernon C Maino; Janice K Payne; Kristine Kuus-Reichel; Jennie C Chang; Amanda Summers; Timothy M Clay; Michael A Morse; H Kim Lyerly; Corazon DeLaRosa; Donna P Ankerst; Mary L Disis Journal: BMC Immunol Date: 2005-07-18 Impact factor: 3.615
Authors: David J Chung; Richard D Carvajal; Michael A Postow; Sneh Sharma; Katherine B Pronschinske; Justin A Shyer; Shahnaz Singh-Kandah; Mark A Dickson; Sandra P D'Angelo; Jedd D Wolchok; James W Young Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Emanuela Romano; Jesse W Cotari; Rosa Barreira da Silva; Brian C Betts; David J Chung; Francesca Avogadri; Mitsu J Fink; Erin T St Angelo; Babak Mehrara; Glenn Heller; Christian Münz; Gregoire Altan-Bonnet; James W Young Journal: Blood Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Emma Shtivelman; Michael Q A Davies; Patrick Hwu; James Yang; Michal Lotem; Moshe Oren; Keith T Flaherty; David E Fisher Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2014-04-15