Literature DB >> 21353418

The role of ADC measurement in differential diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions.

Mehmet Ruhi Onur1, Mehtap Çiçekçi, Alperen Kayalı, Ahmet Kürsad Poyraz, Ercan Kocakoç.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in characterization of focal solid hepatic lesions and determine the role of ADC values in differentiation of solid benign and solid malignant hepatic lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2006 and December 2010, a total of 95 focal solid hepatic lesions in 95 consecutive patients were evaluated by abdominal MRI. Diffusion weighted MRI was performed with b 100, b 600 and b 1000 gradients with ADC measurements. Comparison of mean ADC values between solid benign (focal nodular hyperplasia and other solid benign lesions) and solid malignant lesion (hepatocellular carcinoma, metastasis, and cholangiocarcinoma) groups and between each benign and malignant lesion was done. The ROC analyses were performed in order to determine cut-off ADC values for differentiation of benign and malignant lesion groups at 3 different gradients.
RESULTS: Twenty-six of 95 lesions were benign and 69 were malignant. Mean ADC values of solid benign lesions at b 100, b 600 and b 1000 gradients were 2.25±0.54×10(-3), 1.97±0.64×10(-3) and 1.52±0.47×10(-3) mm2/s, respectively. Mean ADC values of solid malignant lesions at b 100, b 600 and b 1000 gradients were 1.84±0.57×10(-3), 1.37±0.38×10(-3) and 1.08±0.22×10(-3) mm2/s, respectively. The ADC values of solid benign lesions were significantly higher than solid malignant lesions at all 3 gradients (P<0.05). Differentiation of benign and malignant subtype lesions from each other in their groups did not yield as significant findings as comparing results between benign and malignant lesions.
CONCLUSION: Although ADC measurements were not helpful for differentiating subtypes of solid benign or solid malignant lesions, ADC measurements at 3 different gradients may be useful in differential diagnosis of benign lesions from malignant ones.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21353418     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and T2-weighted single shot fast spin-echo: Implications for LI-RADS characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert M Hicks; Judy Yee; Michael A Ohliger; Stefanie Weinstein; Jeffrey Kao; Nabia S Ikram; Thomas A Hope
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Intravoxel incoherent motion: application in differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma and focal nodular hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ma Luo; Ling Zhang; Xin Hua Jiang; Wei Dong Zhang
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions: a systematic review.

Authors:  M A Vermoolen; T C Kwee; R A J Nievelstein
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2012-06-07

4.  Could ADC values be a promising diagnostic criterion for differentiating malignant and benign hepatic lesions in Asian populations: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Peng; Jing-Jin Li; Jiang Li; He-Wen Li; Guo-Ping Xu; Rong-Rong Jia; Xue-Ning Zhang; Yang Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Hepatic sclerosed hemangioma with special attention to diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tatsunori Miyata; Toru Beppu; Kunitaka Kuramoto; Shigeki Nakagawa; Katsunori Imai; Daisuke Hashimoto; Tomohiro Namimoto; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Akira Chikamoto; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-01-03

6.  Small cholangiolocellular carcinoma that was difficult to distinguish from cholangiocellular carcinoma: a case report.

Authors:  Norihiro Ishii; Kenichiro Araki; Takahiro Yamanaka; Tadashi Handa; Mariko Tsukagoshi; Takamichi Igarashi; Akira Watanabe; Norio Kubo; Shinichi Aishima; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Ken Shirabe
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-09-15

Review 7.  Diagnostic evaluation and ablation treatments assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Grassi; Roberta Fusco; Andrea Belli; Carmen Cutolo; Silvia Pradella; Giulia Grazzini; Michelearcangelo La Porta; Maria Chiara Brunese; Federica De Muzio; Alessandro Ottaiano; Antonio Avallone; Francesco Izzo; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.965

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating malignant from benign solid liver lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Farhad Nalaini; Fatemeh Shahbazi; Seyedeh Maryam Mousavinezhad; Ali Ansari; Mohammadgharib Salehi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.629

9.  Hepatic angiomyolipoma with special attention to radiologic imaging.

Authors:  Kunitaka Kuramoto; Toru Beppu; Tomohiro Namimoto; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Katsunori Imai; Hidetoshi Nitta; Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Takatoshi Ishiko; Ken-Ichi Iyama; Osamu Ikeda; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-04-24

10.  Diffusion weighted MR and apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in classification and characterization of noncystic focal liver lesions: does a clinical role exist?

Authors:  Francesco Mungai; Mario Morone; Alberta Villanacci; Maria Pia Bondioni; Lorenzo Nicola Mazzoni; Luigi Grazioli; Stefano Colagrande
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.