Literature DB >> 21352401

Orbital fracture clinical decision rule development: burden of disease and use of a mandatory electronic survey instrument.

Kabir Yadav1, Ethan Cowan, Stephen Wall, Paul Gennis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In preparation for development of a clinical decision rule (CDR) to promote more efficient use of computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing orbital fractures, the authors sought to estimate the annual incidence of orbital fractures in emergency departments (EDs) and the usage of CT to make these diagnoses. The authors also sought to evaluate a mandatory electronic data collection instrument (EDCI) administered to providers to facilitate CDR data collection.
METHODS: National estimates were made by analyzing the 2007 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) database, while hospital billing system and coding data were used to make local estimates. An EDCI was integrated into the CT ordering system such that providers had to complete the form to perform a CT. Because the EDCI had to be filled out for every CT ordered, data collection efficiency was measured by compliance (counting the number of unrealistic data collection instrument answers) and by timing a convenience sample of providers completing the EDCI.
RESULTS: Out of 116.8 million ED visits in the United States in 2007, 4.1 million patients were treated for injuries of the eye and face. Of those, 820,252 patients underwent CT imaging, with 102,999 patients (12.5%) diagnosed with an orbital fracture. In our local hospital system with 122,500 annual ED visits, 752 CTs of orbits were performed, with 172 (23%) orbital fractures. The EDCI compliance rate was 94.9% and took less than 5 minutes to complete.
CONCLUSIONS: National and local data demonstrate a low yield for CT imaging in identifying orbital fractures. Data collection using a mandatory EDCI linked to computerized provider order entry can provide prospective, consecutive patient data that are needed to develop a CDR for the selective use of CT imaging in orbital trauma. Such a decision rule could increase the efficiency in diagnosing orbital fractures, thereby improving patient care, reducing radiation exposure, and decreasing costs.
© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21352401      PMCID: PMC3311987          DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01017.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  18 in total

1.  Emergency physicians' attitudes toward and use of clinical decision rules for radiography.

Authors:  I D Graham; I G Stiell; A Laupacis; A M O'Connor; G A Wells
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Accuracy of routinely collected clinical data on acute medical admissions to one hospital.

Authors:  F D Hobbs; J V Parle; J E Kenkre
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Radioprotection to the eye during CT scanning.

Authors:  K D Hopper; J D Neuman; S H King; A R Kunselman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Management of orbital blowout fractures: the prognostic significance of computed tomography.

Authors:  S M Gilbard
Journal:  Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1987

5.  Subtle diagnostic markers of orbital floor blow-out fracture on coronal CT scan.

Authors:  J M Rowe-Jones; E J Adam; V Moore-Gillon
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 6.  Clinical recommendations for repair of orbital facial fractures.

Authors:  Michael A Burnstine
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Clinical signs of orbital wall fractures as a function of anatomic location.

Authors:  Siegfried Jank; Barbara Schuchter; Rüdiger Emshoff; Heinrich Strobl; Julius Koehler; Alessandro Nicasi; Burghard Norer; Ivo Baldissera
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2003-08

8.  Orbital wall fractures: evaluation and management.

Authors:  J D Osguthorpe
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Radiation dose to the lens of eye and thyroid gland in paranasal sinus multislice CT.

Authors:  I Zammit-Maempel; C L Chadwick; S P Willis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Evaluating the accuracy of transcribed clinical data.

Authors:  R Wilton; A J Pennisi
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1993
View more
  3 in total

1.  Screening Criteria for Detecting Severe Ocular Injuries in the Setting of Orbital Fractures.

Authors:  Karina Richani; Thai H Do; Helen A Merritt; Margaret L Pfeiffer; Alice Z Chuang; Margaret E Phillips
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.746

2.  Practice patterns in the use of prophylactic antibiotics following nonoperative orbital fractures.

Authors:  Jijo Jizhou Wang; Jennifer M Koterwas; Edward H Bedrossian; William J Foster
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-27

3.  Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Orbital Fractures.

Authors:  Benjamin Reiss; Lamise Rajjoub; Tamer Mansour; Tony Chen; Aisha Mumtaz
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2017-01-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.