Literature DB >> 21351187

Prognostic communication preferences of migrant patients and their relatives.

D Mitchison1, P Butow, M Sze, L Aldridge, R Hui, J Vardy, M Eisenbruch, R Iedema, D Goldstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Migrant patients comprise a significant proportion of Western oncologists' clientele. Although previous research has found that barriers exist in the communication between ethnically diverse patients and health professionals, little is known about their personal preferences for communication and information, or the concordance of views held between patients and family members.
METHODS: Seventy-three patients (31 Anglo-Australians, and 20 Chinese, 11 Arabic and 11 Greek migrants) and 65 relatives (25 Anglo-Australians, and 23 Chinese, 11 Arabic and 7 Greek migrants) were recruited through nine Sydney oncology clinics. Following prognostic consultations, participants were interviewed in their preferred language about their experiences and ideals regarding information and communication with oncologists. Interviews were audio-taped, translated and transcribed, and then thematically analysed using N-Vivo software.
RESULTS: Consistency was found in patient preferences, regardless of ethnicity, in that almost all patients preferred prognostic information to be delivered in a caring and personalised manner from an authoritative oncologist. Contrary to previous research, migrant patients often expressed a desire for prognostic disclosure. Discordance was found between migrant patients and their families. These families displayed traditional non-Western preferences of non-disclosure of prognosis and wanted to actively influence consultations by meeting with oncologists separately beforehand and directing the oncologists on what and how information should be conveyed to patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Many of the communication issues facing patients in the metastatic cancer setting are shared amongst Anglo-Australian and migrant patients alike. Understanding the dynamics within migrant families is also an important component in providing culturally sensitive communication. Future directions for research are provided.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21351187     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  17 in total

1.  A new look at informed consent for cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Allison R Baer; Marge Good; Lidia Schapira
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Culturally and linguistically diverse patient participation in glioma research.

Authors:  Zarnie Lwin; Alexander Broom; Rasha Cosman; Ann Livingstone; Kate Sawkins; Phillip Good; Emma Kirby; Eng-Siew Koh; Elizabeth Hovey
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2014-06-25

3.  Understanding patient needs without understanding the patient: the need for complementary use of professional interpreters in end-of-life care.

Authors:  Demi Krystallidou; Ignaas Devisch; Dominique Van de Velde; Peter Pype
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-12

4.  Including migrant oncology patients in research: A multisite pilot randomised controlled trial testing consultation audio-recordings and question prompt lists.

Authors:  Amelia Hyatt; Ruby Lipson-Smith; Karla Gough; Phyllis Butow; Michael Jefford; Thomas F Hack; Sandra Hale; Emiliano Zucchi; Shane White; Uldis Ozolins; Penelope Schofield
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-05-28

5.  Reducing disparity in outcomes for immigrants with cancer: a qualitative assessment of the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally targeted telephone-based supportive care intervention.

Authors:  Joanne Shaw; Phyllis Butow; Ming Sze; Jane Young; David Goldstein
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Italian onco-haematological patients' preferences in bad news communication: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Ramona Bongelli; Alessia Bertolazzi; Ludovica Piccioni; Roberto Burro
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Deciding what information is necessary: do patients with advanced cancer want to know all the details?

Authors:  Bethany J Russell; Alicia M Ward
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Ethnic variation in cancer patients' ratings of information provision, communication and overall care.

Authors:  Lorna Trenchard; Louise Mc Grath-Lone; Helen Ward
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Agreement between patients' and radiation oncologists' cancer diagnosis and prognosis perceptions: A cross sectional study in Japan.

Authors:  Lisa Jane Mackenzie; Mariko Leanne Carey; Eiji Suzuki; Robert William Sanson-Fisher; Hiromi Asada; Masakazu Ogura; Catherine D'Este; Michio Yoshimura; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Radiation oncology outpatient perceptions of patient-centred care: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Lisa J Mackenzie; Rob W Sanson-Fisher; Mariko L Carey; Catherine A D'Este
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.