Literature DB >> 21349696

Gene expression in time and space: additive vs hierarchical organization of cis-regulatory regions.

Robert K Maeda1, François Karch.   

Abstract

In higher eukaryotes, individual genes are often intermingled with other genes and spread out across tens to hundreds of kilobases, even though only small portions of their sequence are devoted to protein coding. Yet, in this seemingly extended and tangled mess, the cell is able to precisely regulate gene expression in both time and space. Over the past few decades, numerous elements, like enhancers, silencers and insulators have been found that shed some light on how the precise control of gene expression is achieved. Through these discoveries, an additive model of gene expression was envisioned, where the addition of the patterning details imparted by regulatory elements would create the final pattern of gene expression. Although many genes can be described using this model, recent work in the Drosophila bithorax complex suggests that this model may be somewhat simplistic and, in fact, regulatory elements sometimes seem to communicate with each other to form a functional hierarchy that is far from additive.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21349696     DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2011.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev        ISSN: 0959-437X            Impact factor:   5.578


  19 in total

Review 1.  A dynamic network of morphogens and transcription factors patterns the fly leg.

Authors:  Carlos Estella; Roumen Voutev; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes.

Authors:  Wouter de Laat; Denis Duboule
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Shadow enhancers enable Hunchback bifunctionality in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Max V Staller; Ben J Vincent; Meghan D J Bragdon; Tara Lydiard-Martin; Zeba Wunderlich; Javier Estrada; Angela H DePace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genome-scale functional characterization of Drosophila developmental enhancers in vivo.

Authors:  Evgeny Z Kvon; Tomas Kazmar; Gerald Stampfel; J Omar Yáñez-Cuna; Michaela Pagani; Katharina Schernhuber; Barry J Dickson; Alexander Stark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Highly conserved ENY2/Sus1 protein binds to Drosophila CTCF and is required for barrier activity.

Authors:  Oksana Maksimenko; Olga Kyrchanova; Artem Bonchuk; Viacheslav Stakhov; Alexander Parshikov; Pavel Georgiev
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.528

6.  Quantitative modeling of a gene's expression from its intergenic sequence.

Authors:  Md Abul Hassan Samee; Saurabh Sinha
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  Polycomb group response elements in Drosophila and vertebrates.

Authors:  Judith A Kassis; J Lesley Brown
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.944

8.  Shadow enhancers: frequently asked questions about distributed cis-regulatory information and enhancer redundancy.

Authors:  Scott Barolo
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  In silico analyses of pericycle cell populations reinforce their relation with associated vasculature in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Boris Parizot; Ianto Roberts; Jeroen Raes; Tom Beeckman; Ive De Smet
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  The boundary paradox in the Bithorax complex.

Authors:  Olga Kyrchanova; Vladic Mogila; Daniel Wolle; Jose Paolo Magbanua; Robert White; Pavel Georgiev; Paul Schedl
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 1.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.