BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many patients with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) have poor insight into their condition. Indeed, their conviction in their ugliness is often delusional. Perhaps the most robust information-processing abnormality associated with delusions is a jumping to conclusions (JTC) reasoning bias such that delusional individuals request significantly less information before making a decision relative to healthy controls. We investigated whether patients with BDD (n = 20) demonstrate a JTC reasoning style relative to patients with OCD (n = 20) and healthy controls (n = 20). METHODS: Participants completed a clinician-rated measure of delusionality and two tests of probabilistic reasoning: the beads task and the survey task. RESULTS: Patients with BDD did exhibit higher delusionality than the patients with OCD. They did not, however, exhibit a JTC reasoning bias relative to the patients with OCD or the healthy controls. Patients with poor insight BDD requested significantly less information before making a decision than did patients with fair insight BDD. LIMITATIONS: The clinical groups were characterized by multiple comorbidities and concomitant medications. The BDD group had relatively good insight as compared to other studies examining delusionality in BDD. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results suggest that although a JTC reasoning bias was not present in all patients with BDD, a modest JTC reasoning bias may be present among patients with poor insight BDD. Future studies could provide additional information on this hypothesis.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many patients with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) have poor insight into their condition. Indeed, their conviction in their ugliness is often delusional. Perhaps the most robust information-processing abnormality associated with delusions is a jumping to conclusions (JTC) reasoning bias such that delusional individuals request significantly less information before making a decision relative to healthy controls. We investigated whether patients with BDD (n = 20) demonstrate a JTC reasoning style relative to patients with OCD (n = 20) and healthy controls (n = 20). METHODS:Participants completed a clinician-rated measure of delusionality and two tests of probabilistic reasoning: the beads task and the survey task. RESULTS:Patients with BDD did exhibit higher delusionality than the patients with OCD. They did not, however, exhibit a JTC reasoning bias relative to the patients with OCD or the healthy controls. Patients with poor insight BDD requested significantly less information before making a decision than did patients with fair insight BDD. LIMITATIONS: The clinical groups were characterized by multiple comorbidities and concomitant medications. The BDD group had relatively good insight as compared to other studies examining delusionality in BDD. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results suggest that although a JTC reasoning bias was not present in all patients with BDD, a modest JTC reasoning bias may be present among patients with poor insight BDD. Future studies could provide additional information on this hypothesis.
Authors: Steven M Silverstein; Corinna M Elliott; Jamie D Feusner; Brian P Keane; Deepthi Mikkilineni; Natasha Hansen; Andrea Hartmann; Sabine Wilhelm Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Katharine A Phillips; Anthony Pinto; Ashley S Hart; Meredith E Coles; Jane L Eisen; William Menard; Steven A Rasmussen Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Ana Catalan; Claudia J P Simons; Sonia Bustamante; Nora Olazabal; Eduardo Ruiz; Maider Gonzalez de Artaza; Alberto Penas; Claudio Maruottolo; Claudio Maurottolo; Andrea González; Jim van Os; Miguel Angel Gonzalez-Torres Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nico Pytlik; Daniel Soll; Klaus Hesse; Steffen Moritz; Andreas Bechdolf; Jutta Herrlich; Tilo Kircher; Stefan Klingberg; Martin W Landsberg; Bernhard W Müller; Georg Wiedemann; Andreas Wittorf; Wolfgang Wölwer; Michael Wagner; Stephanie Mehl Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 3.630