| Literature DB >> 21349206 |
Leila M Sihvonen1, Susanna Toivonen, Kaisa Haukka, Markku Kuusi, Mikael Skurnik, Anja Siitonen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We assessed the potential of multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and antimicrobial susceptibility testing for discriminating 104 sporadic and outbreak-related Yersinia enterocolitica (YE) bio/serotype 3-4/O:3 and 2/O:9 isolates. MLVA using six VNTR markers was performed in two separate multiplex PCRs, and the fluorescently labeled PCR products were accurately sized on an automated DNA sequencer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21349206 PMCID: PMC3053224 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-42
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Figure 1MLVA tree. UPGMA clustering of the MLVA results, with Pearson's correlation similarity coefficients, was performed using Bionumerics version 5.10. The key column provides the strain ID. Information on bio/serotype, travel abroad or place of domicile (PoD), MLVA types named as a string of six numbers showing the actual number of repeat units in each of the six loci, PFGE pulsotype, and antimicrobial resistance are presented in the columns. *Strains isolated from a 1-year old children in the case of a suspected outbreak with PFGE pulsotype 5NotI_ye_a.
Figure 2PFGE types of the studied strains. All 24 representative PFGE types of 104 strains in the present study. * The strain number includes the outbreak types.
Diversity of VNTR alleles.
| Number of the repeats | V2A TCTCAC (bp) | n† | V4 CGGCAAC (bp) | n | V5 GGTGCA (bp) | n | V6 GACTCA (bp) | n | V7 GTGCTG (bp) | n | V9 ATGTCGGTAGAA (bp) | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | - | 119* | 49 | - | - | 108 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 246* | 2 | 126* | 26 | 182 | 1 | - | 120* | 52 | |||
| 4 | 252 | 5 | 133* | 9 | 199 | 2 | 188* | 5 | 195* | 4 | 132 | 8 |
| 5 | 258 | 6 | 140 | 0 | 205 | 4 | 194 | 5 | 201* | 8 | 144* | 40 |
| 6 | 264 | 10 | 147 | 15 | 211 | 3 | 200* | 11 | 207 | 19 | 156 | 2 |
| 7 | 270 | 6 | 154* | 4 | 217 | 6 | 206* | 21 | 213 | 13 | 168* | 3 |
| 8 | 276 | 6 | 161 | 4 | 223* | 25 | 212* | 13 | 219 | 12 | - | |
| 9 | 282* | 7 | - | 229 | 17 | 218 | 2 | 225 | 9 | - | ||
| 10 | 288 | 10 | - | 235 | 15 | 224 | 12 | 231 | 9 | - | ||
| 11 | 294 | 6 | - | 241 | 8 | 230 | 9 | 237 | 7 | - | ||
| 12 | 300 | 10 | - | 247 | 6 | 236 | 10 | 243 | 1 | - | ||
| 13 | 306 | 20 | - | 253 | 6 | 242 | 4 | 249 | 4 | - | ||
| 14 | 312 | 4 | - | 259 | 5 | 248 | 2 | 255* | 16 | - | ||
| 15 | 318 | 3 | - | 265* | 5 | 254 | 3 | 261 | 3 | - | ||
| 16 | 324 | 1 | - | 271 | 3 | 260 | 3 | 267 | - | - | ||
| 17 | 330* | 7 | - | 277 | 1 | 266 | 2 | 273 | - | - | ||
| 18 | 336 | 3 | - | 283 | - | 272 | - | 279 | - | - | ||
| 19 | 342 | 1 | - | 290 | 1 | 278 | - | 285 | - | - | ||
| 20 | - | - | - | 284 | 2 | 291 | 1 | - | ||||
| 21 | - | - | - | 300 | 2 | 297 | - | - | ||||
| 22 | - | - | - | 303* | 1 | - |
Fragment sizes (bp) defined by capillary electrophoresis of VNTR alleles with different number of repeats and their diversity in 107 studied Y. enterocolitica strains.
* Alleles were sequenced to confirm the number of repeats.
† n = number of strains
Antimicrobial resistance and travelling.
| Resistance profile | Suspected outbreak YE 4/O:3 (n = 22) | Sporadic YE 4/O:3 (n = 75) | Sporadic YE 3/O:3 (n = 2) | Sporadic YE 2/O:9 (n = 5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP CHL STR SUL NAL | - | 3 (100%)* | - | - |
| AMP CHL STR SUL TET | 12 (0%) | 5 (40%) | - | - |
| AMP CHL STR SUL TET MEC | - | - | 1 (100%) | - |
| AMP CHL STR SUL | 1 (0%) | 5 (80%) | - | - |
| AMP CHL STR SUL MEC | - | - | 1 (100%) | - |
| AMP SUL | - | 1 (100%) | - | - |
| AMP STR | - | 1 | - | - |
| AMP MEC | - | - | - | - |
| AMP | 9 (0%) | 61 (28%) | - | 5 (0%) |
Antimicrobial resistance profiles of the sporadic Y. enterocolitica strains isolated in Finland in 2006 and suspected outbreak strains from 2003-2004 and related travel information.
* The percentage of the patients who had reported having traveled abroad before getting ill is in the parenthesis.