Literature DB >> 21347934

British American Tobacco's partnership with Earthwatch Europe and its implications for public health.

Patricia A McDaniel1, Ruth E Malone.   

Abstract

This paper explores a partnership between British American Tobacco (BAT) and the environmental organisation Earthwatch Europe (EE) and considers its implications for countries implementing Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. We reviewed approximately 100 internal BAT documents, interviewed EE's former executive director and examined media accounts and BAT and EE websites. We analysed materials by reviewing them iteratively, identifying themes, constructing a timeline of events and assembling a case study. BAT sought a partnership with EE to gain a global ally that could provide entrée into the larger non-governmental organisation (NGO) community. EE debated the ethics of working with BAT, resolving them in BAT's favour and taking a narrow view of its own overall organisational mission. To protect its reputation, EE delayed public disclosure of the partnership. Instead, EE promoted it to policy-makers and other NGOs, extending BAT's reputation and reach into influential circles. The potential for normalising the tobacco industry presence within government through NGO partnerships and the benefits that accrued to BAT even when the partnership was not being publicised show why governments seeking to protect effective tobacco control policies from industry influence need to consider ways to identify and discourage 'hidden' NGO partnerships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21347934      PMCID: PMC3134627          DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2010.549832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Public Health        ISSN: 1744-1692


  13 in total

1.  Do cigarette warnings warn? Understanding what it will take to develop more effective warnings.

Authors:  D M Krugman; R J Fox; P M Fischer
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun

2.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy.

Authors:  Lisa Bero
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Perceptions of the causes of bladder cancer, nasal cancer, and mesothelioma among cases and population controls.

Authors:  K Teschke; L van Zwieten
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  1999-12

5.  Advocacy in action: extreme corporate makeover interruptus: denormalising tobacco industry corporate schmoozing.

Authors:  S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  British American Tobacco's erosion of health legislation in Uzbekistan.

Authors:  Anna B Gilmore; Jeff Collin; Martin McKee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-11

7.  Accuracy of smokers' risk perceptions.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1998

8.  Uneasy money: the Instituto Carlos Slim de la Salud, tobacco philanthropy and conflict of interest in global health.

Authors:  Tiffany Burch; Nathaniel Wander; Jeff Collin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  "Efforts to Reprioritise the Agenda" in China: British American Tobacco's Efforts to Influence Public Policy on Secondhand Smoke in China.

Authors:  Monique E Muggli; Kelley Lee; Quan Gan; Jon O Ebbert; Richard D Hurt
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  The shredding of BAT's defence: McCabe v British American Tobacco Australia.

Authors:  J Liberman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  14 in total

1.  Through tobacco industry eyes: civil society and the FCTC process from Philip Morris and British American Tobacco's perspectives.

Authors:  Mariaelena Gonzalez; Lawrence W Green; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Global Fund needs to address conflict of interest.

Authors:  Anna B Gilmore; Gary Fooks
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 3.  Environmental impacts of tobacco product waste: International and Australian policy responses.

Authors:  Lucinda A Wallbank; Ross MacKenzie; Paul J Beggs
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Planting trees without leaving home: tobacco company direct-to-consumer CSR efforts.

Authors:  Mariaelena Gonzalez; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  US Media Coverage of Tobacco Industry Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; E Anne Lown; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-02

6.  Financial Conflicts of Interest and Stance on Tobacco Harm Reduction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yogi H Hendlin; Manali Vora; Jesse Elias; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Term limits and the tobacco industry.

Authors:  Dorie E Apollonio; Stanton A Glantz; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  African media coverage of tobacco industry corporate social responsibility initiatives.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Brie Cadman; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2016-03-07

9.  Shared vision, shared vulnerability: A content analysis of corporate social responsibility information on tobacco industry websites.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Brie Cadman; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Corporate philanthropy, political influence, and health policy.

Authors:  Gary J Fooks; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.