Literature DB >> 21347055

Automatic selection of preprocessing methods for improving predictions on mass spectrometry protein profiles.

Richard C Pelikan1, Milos Hauskrecht.   

Abstract

Mass spectrometry proteomic profiling has potential to be a useful clinical screening tool. One obstacle is providing a standardized method for preprocessing the noisy raw data. We have developed a system for automatically determining a set of preprocessing methods among several candidates. Our system's automated nature relieves the analyst of the need to be knowledgeable about which methods to use on any given dataset. Each stage of preprocessing is approached with many competing methods. We introduce metrics which are used to balance each method's attempts to correct noise versus preserving valuable discriminative information. We demonstrate the benefit of our preprocessing system on several SELDI and MALDI mass spectrometry datasets. Downstream classification is improved when using our system to preprocess the data.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21347055      PMCID: PMC3041275     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  17 in total

1.  A variance-stabilizing transformation for gene-expression microarray data.

Authors:  B P Durbin; J S Hardin; D M Hawkins; D M Rocke
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  SpecAlign--processing and alignment of mass spectra datasets.

Authors:  Jason W H Wong; Gerard Cagney; Hugh M Cartwright
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Serum protein profiling by solid phase extraction and mass spectrometry: a future diagnostics tool?

Authors:  Anne K Callesen; Jonna S Madsen; Werner Vach; Torben A Kruse; Ole Mogensen; Ole N Jensen
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Comparison of algorithms for pre-processing of SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Alejandro Cruz-Marcelo; Rudy Guerra; Marina Vannucci; Yiting Li; Ching C Lau; Tsz-Kwong Man
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Islet protein profiling.

Authors:  P Bergsten
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.577

6.  Feature Selection for Classification of SELDI-TOF-MS Proteomic Profiles.

Authors:  Milos Hauskrecht; Richard Pelikan; David E Malehorn; William L Bigbee; Michael T Lotze; Herbert J Zeh; David C Whitcomb; James Lyons-Weiler
Journal:  Appl Bioinformatics       Date:  2005

7.  High-resolution serum proteomic profiling of Alzheimer disease samples reveals disease-specific, carrier-protein-bound mass signatures.

Authors:  Mary F Lopez; Alvydas Mikulskis; Scott Kuzdzal; David A Bennett; Jeremiah Kelly; Eva Golenko; Joseph DiCesare; Eric Denoyer; Wayne F Patton; Richard Ediger; Lisa Sapp; Tillmann Ziegert; Christopher Lynch; Susan Kramer; Gordon R Whiteley; Michael R Wall; David P Mannion; Guy Della Cioppa; John S Rakitan; Gershon M Wolfe
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Improved peak detection and quantification of mass spectrometry data acquired from surface-enhanced laser desorption and ionization by denoising spectra with the undecimated discrete wavelet transform.

Authors:  Kevin R Coombes; Spiridon Tsavachidis; Jeffrey S Morris; Keith A Baggerly; Mien-Chie Hung; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Comparison of normalisation methods for surface-enhanced laser desorption and ionisation (SELDI) time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Wouter Meuleman; Judith Ymn Engwegen; Marie-Christine W Gast; Jos H Beijnen; Marcel Jt Reinders; Lodewyk Fa Wessels
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.