Literature DB >> 21347053

The physical attractiveness of electronic physician notes.

Thomas H Payne1, Rupa Patel, Sally Beahan, Jacquie Zehner.   

Abstract

Though notes in electronic medical record systems (EMRs) have advantages, they are often criticized for their unattractive and unprofessional appearance. We sought to identify notes regarded by physicians as attractive and unattractive and the characteristics of both. We sent a sample of 10 notes representing a variety of common note types to a sample of 70 physicians who are either leaders in UW Medicine or randomly selected note authors and asked them to rank the notes by their physical attractivness. We found their rankings were not random, and notes clustered into those considered most, intermediate, and least attractive. Characteristics of each group are presented. We'll use these results to format EMR notes in a more attractive form-a goal important to our physicians-while preserving important clinical, quality and compliance features that were our original goals in moving to electronic notes.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21347053      PMCID: PMC3041462     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  5 in total

1.  A piece of my mind. Copy-and-paste.

Authors:  Robert E Hirschtick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Catherine M DesRoches; Eric G Campbell; Karen Donelan; Sowmya R Rao; Timothy G Ferris; Alexandra Shields; Sara Rosenbaum; David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Preliminary development of the physician documentation quality instrument.

Authors:  Peter D Stetson; Frances P Morrison; Suzanne Bakken; Stephen B Johnson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Off the record--avoiding the pitfalls of going electronic.

Authors:  Pamela Hartzband; Jerome Groopman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Transition from paper to electronic inpatient physician notes.

Authors:  Thomas H Payne; Aharon E tenBroek; Grant S Fletcher; Mardi C Labuguen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  What do physicians read (and ignore) in electronic progress notes?

Authors:  P J Brown; J L Marquard; B Amster; M Romoser; J Friderici; S Goff; D Fisher
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  What are they trying to do?: An analysis of Action Identities in using electronic documentation in an EHR.

Authors:  Charlene R Weir; Catherine Staes; Stacey Slager; Teresa Taft; Valiammai Chidambaram; Heidi Kramer; Bruce E Bray; Seneca Perri Moore
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

3.  The role of copy and paste function in orthopedic trauma progress notes.

Authors:  Wesley Winn; Irshad A Shakir; Heidi Israel; Lisa K Cannada
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-04-25

4.  The effectiveness of a bundled intervention to improve resident progress notes in an electronic health record.

Authors:  Shannon M Dean; Jens C Eickhoff; Leigh Anne Bakel
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.960

5.  Assessing Electronic Note Quality Using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9).

Authors:  Peter D Stetson; Suzanne Bakken; Jesse O Wrenn; Eugenia L Siegler
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Using voice to create inpatient progress notes: effects on note timeliness, quality, and physician satisfaction.

Authors:  Thomas H Payne; W David Alonso; J Andrew Markiel; Kevin Lybarger; Ross Lordon; Meliha Yetisgen; Jennifer M Zech; Andrew A White
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2018-09-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.