Literature DB >> 21346979

A Weighty Problem: Identification, Characteristics and Risk Factors for Errors in EMR Data.

Saveli I Goldberg1, Maria Shubina, Andrzej Niemierko, Alexander Turchin.   

Abstract

EMR data are used for decision support, research and quality control; it is important to assure their accuracy. Researchers have reported poor accuracy of categorical EMR records but little information is available on the accuracy of quantitative EMR data.We designed an algorithm for identification of errors in EMR weight data. The algorithm achieved precision of 98.9% with upper boundary for sensitivity of 57.6%.We employed the algorithm to analyze 420,469 weight records of 25,000 patients. The algorithm identified errors in 0.58% of entries in up to 7% of all patients. Users who previously made an error were nearly twice as likely to make another (p < 0.001) and physicians were less likely to make an error than non-physicians (p = 0.034). User practice location had a significant effect on their error rate (p =0.015).Rapid and accurate error identification could be used to improve quality of EMR weight data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21346979      PMCID: PMC3041371     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  7 in total

1.  A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care.

Authors:  David W Bates; Mark Ebell; Edward Gotlieb; John Zapp; H C Mullins
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Use of clinical alerting to improve the collection of clinical research data.

Authors:  Krystl Haerian; Jon McKeeby; Gary Dipatrizio; James J Cimino
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

3.  How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Timothy G Ferris; Karen Donelan; Catherine DesRoches; Alexandra Shields; Sara Rosenbaum; David Blumenthal
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  A framework for capturing clinical data sets from computerized sources.

Authors:  C J McDonald; J M Overhage; P Dexter; B Y Takesue; D M Dwyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  The accuracy of medication data in an outpatient electronic medical record.

Authors:  M M Wagner; W R Hogan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Accuracy of computerized outpatient diagnoses in a Veterans Affairs general medicine clinic.

Authors:  Herbert C Szeto; Robert K Coleman; Parisa Gholami; Brian B Hoffman; Mary K Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Assessing the accuracy of computerized medication histories.

Authors:  Peter J Kaboli; Brad J McClimon; Angela B Hoth; Mitchell J Barnett
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.229

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  A critical assessment of early warning score records in 168,000 patients.

Authors:  Niels Egholm Pedersen; Lars Simon Rasmussen; John Asger Petersen; Thomas Alexander Gerds; Doris Østergaard; Anne Lippert
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.502

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.