Braxton D Mitchell1, Laura M Yerges-Armstrong. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA. bmitchel@medicine.umaryland.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: A strong genetic influence on bone mineral density has been long established, and modern genotyping technologies have generated a flurry of new discoveries about the genetic determinants of bone mineral density (BMD) measured at a single time point. However, much less is known about the genetics of age-related bone loss. Identifying bone loss-related genes may provide new routes for therapeutic intervention and osteoporosis prevention. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A review of published peer-reviewed literature on the genetics of bone loss was performed. Relevant studies were summarized, most of which were drawn from the period 1990-2010. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Although bone loss is a challenging phenotype, available evidence supports a substantial genetic contribution. Some of the genes identified from recent genome-wide association studies of cross-sectional BMD are attractive candidate genes for bone loss, most notably genes in the nuclear factor κB and estrogen endocrine pathways. New insights into the biology of skeletal development and regulation of bone turnover have inspired new hypotheses about genetic regulation of bone loss and may provide new directions for identifying genes associated with bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: Although recent genome-wide association and candidate gene studies have begun to identify genes that influence BMD, efforts to identify susceptibility genes specific for bone loss have proceeded more slowly. Nevertheless, clues are beginning to emerge on where to look, and as population studies accumulate, there is hope that important bone loss susceptibility genes will soon be identified.
CONTEXT: A strong genetic influence on bone mineral density has been long established, and modern genotyping technologies have generated a flurry of new discoveries about the genetic determinants of bone mineral density (BMD) measured at a single time point. However, much less is known about the genetics of age-related bone loss. Identifying bone loss-related genes may provide new routes for therapeutic intervention and osteoporosis prevention. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A review of published peer-reviewed literature on the genetics of bone loss was performed. Relevant studies were summarized, most of which were drawn from the period 1990-2010. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Although bone loss is a challenging phenotype, available evidence supports a substantial genetic contribution. Some of the genes identified from recent genome-wide association studies of cross-sectional BMD are attractive candidate genes for bone loss, most notably genes in the nuclear factor κB and estrogen endocrine pathways. New insights into the biology of skeletal development and regulation of bone turnover have inspired new hypotheses about genetic regulation of bone loss and may provide new directions for identifying genes associated with bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: Although recent genome-wide association and candidate gene studies have begun to identify genes that influence BMD, efforts to identify susceptibility genes specific for bone loss have proceeded more slowly. Nevertheless, clues are beginning to emerge on where to look, and as population studies accumulate, there is hope that important bone loss susceptibility genes will soon be identified.
Authors: L M Salamone; J A Cauley; J Zmuda; A Pasagian-Macaulay; R S Epstein; R E Ferrell; D M Black; L H Kuller Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Howard A Fink; Susan K Ewing; Kristine E Ensrud; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Brent C Taylor; Jane A Cauley; Eric S Orwoll Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-07-18 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Susan P Moffett; Joseph M Zmuda; Jane A Cauley; Katie L Stone; Michael C Nevitt; Kristine E Ensrud; Teresa A Hillier; Marc C Hochberg; Geoff Joslyn; Phillip Morin; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2004-07-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Chunyan He; Peter Kraft; Constance Chen; Julie E Buring; Guillaume Paré; Susan E Hankinson; Stephen J Chanock; Paul M Ridker; David J Hunter; Daniel I Chasman Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-05-17 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: S C Kaste; A Qi; K Smith; H Surprise; E Lovorn; J Boyett; R J Ferry; M V Relling; S A Shurtleff; C H Pui; L Carbone; M M Hudson; K K Ness Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: E Laird; A M Molloy; H McNulty; M Ward; K McCarroll; L Hoey; C F Hughes; C Cunningham; J J Strain; M C Casey Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Peggy Benisch; Tatjana Schilling; Ludger Klein-Hitpass; Sönke P Frey; Lothar Seefried; Nadja Raaijmakers; Melanie Krug; Martina Regensburger; Sabine Zeck; Thorsten Schinke; Michael Amling; Regina Ebert; Franz Jakob Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 3.240