PURPOSE: Because recent studies indicate that blocking the interaction between p53 and Mdm2 results in the nongenotoxic activation of p53, the authors sought to investigate whether the inhibition of p53-Mdm2 binding activates p53 and sensitizes human retinal epithelial cells to apoptosis. METHODS: Apoptosis was evaluated by the activation of caspases and DNA fragmentation assays. The Mdm2 antagonist Nutlin-3 was used to dissociate p53 from Mdm2 and, thus, to increase p53 activity. Knockdown of p53 expression was accomplished by using p53 siRNA. RESULTS: ARPE-19 and primary RPE cells expressed high levels of the antiapoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. Exposure of these cells to camptothecin (CPT) or TNF-α/ cycloheximide (CHX) failed to induce apoptosis. In contrast, treatment with the Mdm2 antagonist Nutlin-3 in the absence of CPT or TNF-α/CHX increased apoptosis. Activation of p53 in response to Nutlin-3 also increased levels of Noxa, p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA), and Siva-1, decreased expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, and simultaneously increased caspases-9 and -3 activities and DNA fragmentation. Knockdown of p53 decreased the basal expression of p21Cip1 and Bcl-2, inhibited the Nutlin-3-induced upregulation of Siva-1 and PUMA expression, and consequently inhibited caspase-3 activation. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the normally available pool of intracellular p53 is predominantly engaged in the regulation of cell cycle checkpoints by p21Cip1 and does not trigger apoptosis in response to DNA-damaging agents. However, the blockage of p53 binding to Mdm2 frees a pool of p53 that is sufficient, even in the absence of DNA-damaging agents, to increase the expression of proapoptotic targets and to override the resistance of RPE cells to apoptosis.
PURPOSE: Because recent studies indicate that blocking the interaction between p53 and Mdm2 results in the nongenotoxic activation of p53, the authors sought to investigate whether the inhibition of p53-Mdm2 binding activates p53 and sensitizes human retinal epithelial cells to apoptosis. METHODS: Apoptosis was evaluated by the activation of caspases and DNA fragmentation assays. The Mdm2 antagonist Nutlin-3 was used to dissociate p53 from Mdm2 and, thus, to increase p53 activity. Knockdown of p53 expression was accomplished by using p53 siRNA. RESULTS:ARPE-19 and primary RPE cells expressed high levels of the antiapoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. Exposure of these cells to camptothecin (CPT) or TNF-α/ cycloheximide (CHX) failed to induce apoptosis. In contrast, treatment with the Mdm2 antagonist Nutlin-3 in the absence of CPT or TNF-α/CHX increased apoptosis. Activation of p53 in response to Nutlin-3 also increased levels of Noxa, p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA), and Siva-1, decreased expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, and simultaneously increased caspases-9 and -3 activities and DNA fragmentation. Knockdown of p53 decreased the basal expression of p21Cip1 and Bcl-2, inhibited the Nutlin-3-induced upregulation of Siva-1 and PUMA expression, and consequently inhibited caspase-3 activation. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the normally available pool of intracellular p53 is predominantly engaged in the regulation of cell cycle checkpoints by p21Cip1 and does not trigger apoptosis in response to DNA-damaging agents. However, the blockage of p53 binding to Mdm2 frees a pool of p53 that is sufficient, even in the absence of DNA-damaging agents, to increase the expression of proapoptotic targets and to override the resistance of RPE cells to apoptosis.
Authors: Lin Chen; Simon N Willis; Andrew Wei; Brian J Smith; Jamie I Fletcher; Mark G Hinds; Peter M Colman; Catherine L Day; Jerry M Adams; David C S Huang Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2005-02-04 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Llorenç Coll-Mulet; Daniel Iglesias-Serret; Antonio F Santidrián; Ana M Cosialls; Mercè de Frias; Esther Castaño; Clara Campàs; Montserrat Barragán; Alberto Fernández de Sevilla; Alicia Domingo; Lyubomir T Vassilev; Gabriel Pons; Joan Gil Journal: Blood Date: 2006-01-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Tom Van Maerken; Frank Speleman; Joëlle Vermeulen; Irina Lambertz; Sarah De Clercq; Els De Smet; Nurten Yigit; Vicky Coppens; Jan Philippé; Anne De Paepe; Jean-Christophe Marine; Jo Vandesompele Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Sang Eun Park; Ju Dong Song; Kang Mi Kim; Yeong Min Park; Nam Deuk Kim; Young Hyun Yoo; Young Chul Park Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 2006-12-13 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: Nikia A Laurie; Stacy L Donovan; Chie-Schin Shih; Jiakun Zhang; Nicholas Mills; Christine Fuller; Amina Teunisse; Suzanne Lam; Yolande Ramos; Adithi Mohan; Dianna Johnson; Matthew Wilson; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Micaela Quarto; Sarah Francoz; Susan M Mendrysa; R Kiplin Guy; Jean-Christophe Marine; Aart G Jochemsen; Michael A Dyer Journal: Nature Date: 2006-11-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sujoy Bhattacharya; Edward Chaum; Dianna A Johnson; Leonard R Johnson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Salvador Pastor-Idoate; Irene Rodríguez-Hernández; Jimena Rojas; Itziar Fernández; María T García-Gutiérrez; José M Ruiz-Moreno; Amandio Rocha-Sousa; Yashin Ramkissoon; Steven Harsum; Robert E MacLaren; David Charteris; Jan C VanMeurs; Rogelio González-Sarmiento; José C Pastor Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240