Literature DB >> 21345423

[Implementation of a perioperative multimodal rehabilitation protocol in elective colorectal surgery. A prospective randomised controlled study].

Stephanie García-Botello1, Raúl Cánovas de Lucas, Carlos Tornero, Benjamín Escamilla, Alejandro Espí-Macías, Pedro Esclapez-Valero, Blas Flor-Lorente, Eduardo García-Granero.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal rehabilitation (MMR) consists of a combination of several methods for management of the surgical patient, designed to reduce the response to surgical stress and a more comfortable and earlier recovery.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the implementation of an MMR protocol in a Colorectal Surgery Unit, and to compare the results with the traditional model, as well as assessing its efficacy as regards recovery and hospital stay.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 119 patients who received elective surgery for colorectal diseases in a period during 2009-2010 were prospectively and randomly analysed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 58 patients were assigned to the traditional group and 61 to the MMR group. The MMR group protocol consisted of, preoperative education, early feeding and mobilisation.
RESULTS: Both groups were homogeneous as regards the preoperative variables evaluated, the type of disease and the procedures carried out. The nasogastric tube was kept in place for 4 (1-9) days compared to 1 day (0-2) in the MMR group, with no differences in the number of re-insertions. Significant differences were found in the introduction of a liquid diet (3 [1-5] days traditional versus 0 [0-2] MMR) (P<.001), and passing of first flatulence (3 [1-6] days traditional versus 1 [1-3] MMR) (P<.001). The MMR group had a postoperative stay of 4.15±2.18 versus 9.23±6.97 days in the traditional group (P<.001). No significant differences were found in complications or readmissions.
CONCLUSIONS: MMR in colorectal surgery in the Spanish public health system is feasible and enables surgical patients to have a faster recovery without increasing complications, leading to an earlier hospital discharge.
Copyright © 2010 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21345423     DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cir Esp        ISSN: 0009-739X            Impact factor:   1.653


  13 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Massimiliano Greco; Giovanni Capretti; Luigi Beretta; Marco Gemma; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marco Braga
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Enhancing surgical performance outcomes through process-driven care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Rajesh Aggarwal; Pritam Singh; Ara Darzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  David E Messenger; Nathan J Curtis; Adam Jones; Emma L Jones; Neil J Smart; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Safety of fast-track rehabilitation after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liu-Hua Wang; Fang Fang; Chun-Ming Lu; Dao-Rong Wang; Ping Li; Ping Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Comprehensive literature review of randomized clinical trials examining novel treatment advances in patients with colon cancer.

Authors:  William Paul Skelton; Aaron J Franke; Atif Iqbal; Thomas J George
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-08

Review 6.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs Improve Patient Outcomes and Recovery: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christine S M Lau; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement.

Authors:  Vijaya Gottumukkala; Thomas A Aloia; Ryan W Day; Sharon Fielder; John Calhoun; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Cost impact analysis of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program implementation in Alberta colon cancer patients.

Authors:  G Nelson; L N Kiyang; A Chuck; N X Thanh; L M Gramlich
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 9.  An overview and methodological assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of enhanced recovery programmes in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Duncan Chambers; Fiona Paton; Paul Wilson; Alison Eastwood; Dawn Craig; Dave Fox; David Jayne; Erika McGinnes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Effectiveness and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes: a rapid evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Fiona Paton; Duncan Chambers; Paul Wilson; Alison Eastwood; Dawn Craig; Dave Fox; David Jayne; Erika McGinnes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.