PURPOSE: Pain can hinder immunotherapy with anti-G(D2) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) like 3F8. Heat-modified 3F8 (HM3F8) lacks effector functions and could mask G(D2) or cross-reactive epitopes on nerves, thereby preventing a subsequent dose of unmodified 3F8 from activating pain fibers. We hypothesized that 3F8 dose escalation is possible without increased analgesic requirements in patients pretreated with HM3F8. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with resistant neuroblastoma (NB) received one to two cycles of 3F8 plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. 3F8 dosing began at 20 mg/m(2)/d and increased by 20 mg/m(2)/d in the absence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Premedication included analgesics, antihistamines, and 5-minute infusions of HM3F8. On the basis of experience with 3F8 10 mg/m(2)/d in prior protocols, the DLT of pain was defined as more than seven doses of opioids administered within 2 hours. Opioid use was compared with a contemporary control group treated with 3F8 20 mg/m(2)/d but no HM3F8. Disease response was assessed. RESULTS: Treatment was administered in the outpatient setting. Dose escalation stopped at 160 mg/m(2)/d because of drug supply limitations; even through this dosage level, analgesic requirements were similar to historical controls, and there were no DLTs. Analgesic requirements at 3F8 dosage levels through 80 mg/m(2)/d were significantly less compared with controls. Anti-NB activity occurred at all dosages. CONCLUSION: Multifold dose escalation of 3F8 is feasible. The findings can be interpreted as compatible with the possibility that HM3F8 can modify toxicity without blunting anti-NB activity. This pain control strategy may help achieve dose escalation with other anti-G(D2) MoAbs.
PURPOSE:Pain can hinder immunotherapy with anti-G(D2) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) like 3F8. Heat-modified 3F8 (HM3F8) lacks effector functions and could mask G(D2) or cross-reactive epitopes on nerves, thereby preventing a subsequent dose of unmodified 3F8 from activating pain fibers. We hypothesized that 3F8 dose escalation is possible without increased analgesic requirements in patients pretreated with HM3F8. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with resistant neuroblastoma (NB) received one to two cycles of 3F8 plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. 3F8 dosing began at 20 mg/m(2)/d and increased by 20 mg/m(2)/d in the absence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Premedication included analgesics, antihistamines, and 5-minute infusions of HM3F8. On the basis of experience with 3F8 10 mg/m(2)/d in prior protocols, the DLT of pain was defined as more than seven doses of opioids administered within 2 hours. Opioid use was compared with a contemporary control group treated with 3F8 20 mg/m(2)/d but no HM3F8. Disease response was assessed. RESULTS: Treatment was administered in the outpatient setting. Dose escalation stopped at 160 mg/m(2)/d because of drug supply limitations; even through this dosage level, analgesic requirements were similar to historical controls, and there were no DLTs. Analgesic requirements at 3F8 dosage levels through 80 mg/m(2)/d were significantly less compared with controls. Anti-NB activity occurred at all dosages. CONCLUSION: Multifold dose escalation of 3F8 is feasible. The findings can be interpreted as compatible with the possibility that HM3F8 can modify toxicity without blunting anti-NB activity. This pain control strategy may help achieve dose escalation with other anti-G(D2) MoAbs.
Authors: Alice L Yu; Andrew L Gilman; M Fevzi Ozkaynak; Wendy B London; Susan G Kreissman; Helen X Chen; Malcolm Smith; Barry Anderson; Judith G Villablanca; Katherine K Matthay; Hiro Shimada; Stephan A Grupp; Robert Seeger; C Patrick Reynolds; Allen Buxton; Ralph A Reisfeld; Steven D Gillies; Susan L Cohn; John M Maris; Paul M Sondel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M F Ozkaynak; P M Sondel; M D Krailo; J Gan; B Javorsky; R A Reisfeld; K K Matthay; G H Reaman; R C Seeger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-12-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F D Miraldi; A D Nelson; C Kraly; S Ellery; B Landmeier; P F Coccia; S E Strandjord; N K Cheung Journal: Radiology Date: 1986-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: N K Cheung; H Lazarus; F D Miraldi; C R Abramowsky; S Kallick; U M Saarinen; T Spitzer; S E Strandjord; P F Coccia; N A Berger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1987-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thorsten Simon; Barbara Hero; Andreas Faldum; Rupert Handgretinger; Martin Schrappe; Dietrich Niethammer; Frank Berthold Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Dana L Casey; Brian H Kushner; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Shakeel Modak; Ellen M Basu; Stephen S Roberts; Michael P LaQuaglia; Suzanne L Wolden Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Doralina L Anghelescu; Jacob L Goldberg; Lane G Faughnan; Jianrong Wu; Shenghua Mao; Wayne L Furman; Victor M Santana; Fariba Navid Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Brian H Kushner; Irene Y Cheung; Shakeel Modak; Ellen M Basu; Stephen S Roberts; Nai-Kong Cheung Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 31.777