Literature DB >> 21343521

Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm.

David Gur1, Andriy I Bandos, Howard E Rockette, Margarita L Zuley, Jules H Sumkin, Denise M Chough, Christiane M Hakim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess diagnostic performance when retrospectively interpreting full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and breast tomosynthesis examinations under a free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) paradigm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed FROC analysis of a previously reported study in which eight experienced radiologists interpreted 125 examinations, including 35 with verified cancers. The FROC paradigm involves detecting, locating, and rating each suspected abnormality. Radiologists reviewed and rated both FFDM alone and a combined display mode of FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) (combined). Observer performance levels were assessed and compared with respect to the fraction of correctly identified abnormalities, the number of reported location-specific findings (both true and false), and their associated ratings. The analysis accounts for the number and locations of findings and the location-based ratings using a summary performance index (Λ), which is the FROC analog of the area between the receiver operating characteristic curve and the diagonal (chance) line.
RESULTS: Under the FROC paradigm, each reader detected more true abnormalities associated with cancer, or a higher true-positive fraction, under the combined mode. In an analysis focused on both the number of findings and associated location-based ratings, each of the radiologists performed better under the combined mode compared with FFDM alone, with increases in Λ ranging from 5% to 34%. On average, under the combined mode radiologists achieved a 16% improvement in Λ compared with the FFDM alone mode (95% CI, 7-26%; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: We showed that DBT-based breast imaging in combination with FFDM could result in better performance under the FROC paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21343521     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  23 in total

1.  A nonparametric procedure for comparing the areas under correlated LROC curves.

Authors:  Adam Wunderlich; Frédéric Noo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ji Soo Choi; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Ga Ram Kim; Eun Sook Ko; Ko Woon Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions.

Authors:  Margarita L Zuley; Andriy I Bandos; Marie A Ganott; Jules H Sumkin; Amy E Kelly; Victor J Catullo; Grace Y Rathfon; Amy H Lu; David Gur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; R Edward Hendrick; Patricia Ruppel; Roberta Chersevani; Cosimo di Maggio; Manuela La Grassa; Luigi Pescarini; Ilaria Polico; Alessandro Proietti; Enrica Baldan; Elisabetta Bezzon; Fabio Pomerri; Pier Carlo Muzzio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study.

Authors:  Fabienne Thibault; Clarisse Dromain; Catherine Breucq; Corinne S Balleyguier; Caroline Malhaire; Luc Steyaert; Anne Tardivon; Enrica Baldan; Harir Drevon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Appearance on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Ahuva Grubstein; Yael Rapson; Sara Morgenstern; Itai Gadiel; Amit Haboosheh; Rinat Yerushalmi; Maya Cohen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density.

Authors:  Sung Ui Shin; Jung Min Chang; Min Sun Bae; Su Hyun Lee; Nariya Cho; Mirinae Seo; Won Hwa Kim; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in multiscale bilateral filtering regularized reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volume.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Yao Lu; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Jun Wei; Berkman Sahiner; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  A brief history of free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm data analysis.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.