Literature DB >> 21341304

Bayes computation for ecological inference.

Jon Wakefield1, Sebastien Haneuse, Adrian Dobra, Elizabeth Teeple.   

Abstract

Ecological data are available at the level of the group, rather than at the level of the individual. The use of ecological data in spatial epidemiological investigations is particularly common. Although the computational methods described are more generally applicable, this paper concentrates on the situation in which the margins of 2 × 2 tables are observed in each of n geographical areas, with a Bayesian approach to inference. We consider auxiliary schemes that impute the missing data, and compare with a previously suggested normal approximation. The analysis of ecological data is subject to ecological bias, with the only reliable means of removing such bias being the addition of auxiliary individual-level information. Various schemes have been suggested for this supplementation, and we illustrate how the computational methods may be applied to the analysis of such enhanced data. The methods are illustrated using simulated data and two examples. In the first example, the ecological data are supplemented with a simple random sample of individual-level data, and in this example the normal approximation fails. In the second example case-control sampling provides the additional information.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21341304      PMCID: PMC3178414          DOI: 10.1002/sim.4214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  12 in total

Review 1.  Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification.

Authors:  S Greenland; H Morgenstern
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Improving ecological inference using individual-level data.

Authors:  Christopher Jackson; Nicky Best; Sylvia Richardson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Hierarchical models for combining ecological and case-control data.

Authors:  Sebastien J-P A Haneuse; Jonathan C Wakefield
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Ecologic studies revisited.

Authors:  Jonathan Wakefield
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  Overcoming ecologic bias using the two-phase study design.

Authors:  Jon Wakefield; Sebastien J-P A Haneuse
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Multi-level modelling, the ecologic fallacy, and hybrid study designs.

Authors:  Jon Wakefield
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  The Combination of Ecological and Case-Control Data.

Authors:  Sebastien J-P A Haneuse; Jonathan C Wakefield
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.488

8.  On the reliability and precision of within- and between- population estimates of relative rate parameters.

Authors:  L Sheppard; R L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Comparison of relative risks obtained in ecological and individual studies: some methodological considerations.

Authors:  S Richardson; I Stücker; D Hémon
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 10.  Invited commentary: ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples.

Authors:  S Greenland; J Robins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Spatio-Temporal Modeling Framework for Surveillance Data of Multiple Infectious Pathogens with Small Laboratory Validation Sets.

Authors:  Xueying Tang; Yang Yang; Hong-Jie Yu; Qiao-Hong Liao; Nikolay Bliznyuk
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 5.033

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.