| Literature DB >> 21339804 |
Celso S Matsumoto1, Kei Shinoda, Kazuo Nakatsuka.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether a significant correlation exists between the scotopic and photopic components of electroretinograms (ERGs) and the degree of circulation disturbances caused by a central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).Entities:
Keywords: central retinal artery occlusion; fluorescein angiography; photopic electroretinogram; photopic negative response; scotopic electroretinogram
Year: 2011 PMID: 21339804 PMCID: PMC3037039 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S16053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
Demographics of the patients with CRAO
| Case | Age (years) | Gender | Bilaterality | Group | First visit day | Visual acuity | Time until ERG recording |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72 | F | L | 1 | 3 | 0.2 | 30 d |
| 2 | 68 | F | R | 1 | 0 | HM | 10 h |
| 3 | 81 | F | R | 1 | 2 | 0.06 | 3 d |
| 4 | 73 | F | R | 1 | 1 | HM | 13 d |
| 5 | 59 | M | L | 1 | 0 | 0.04 | 2 h |
| 6 | 71 | M | L | 2 | 0 | 0.04 | 12 h |
| 7 | 66 | M | R | 2 | 0 | PL(−) | 30 h |
| 8 | 79 | M | R | 2 | 10 | HM | 9 d |
| 9 | 44 | F | R | 2 | 0 | SL(−) | 30 d |
| 10 | 80 | F | L | 2 | 0 | HM | 24 h |
| 11 | 61 | M | L | 2 | 0 | PL(+) | 3 h |
| 12 | 66 | M | R | 2 | 1 | PL(−) | 6 d |
| 13 | 74 | F | R | 2 | 0 | PL(−) | 28 h |
Notes: Cases 1 and 9 were excluded from the ERG analysis.
All patients developed unilateral CRAO and the healthy fellow eye served as control except for case 8 who developed branch retinal vein occlusion in the left eye.
Abbreviations: CRAO, central retinal artery occlusion; ERG, electroretinogram; F, female; M, male; L, left eye; R, right eye; HM, hand motion; PL, perception of light; PL(+), with perception of light; PL(−), without perception of light; group 1, arm-to-retina time <30 sec; group 2, arm-to-retina time ≥30 sec in fluorescein angiography; ‘first visit’ day 0, patient visited clinic within 24 h after onset; h, hours; d, days.
Figure 1ERGs recorded from the normal fellow eye (left) and eye with a central retinal artery occlusion (right).
Abbreviations: ERG, electroretinogram; CRAO, central retinal artery occlusion; PhNR, photopic negative response.
Figure 2Distribution of the visual acuities at the initial visit in the two groups.
Abbreviations: HM, hand motion; CF, counting finger; PL, perception of light; PL(+), with perception of light; PL(−), without perception of light.
Figure 3The b-wave/a-wave ratio of the ERGs in eyes with a CRAO and the fellow eyes elicited by standard flash (left) and by scotopic bright flash (right) recommended by the ISCEV. Only one eye with a CRAO had a b/a ratio <1.0 in the recordings with standard flash (left). The error bars represent the standard deviation.
Abbreviations: ERG, electroretinogram; CRAO, central retinal artery occlusion; ISCEV, International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision.
Figure 4Average amplitudes of the ERGs recorded under scotopic conditions in the two groups and the control fellow eyes. Left: the amplitudes of the b-wave of the scotopic rod ERG. Middle and right: the amplitudes of the a- and b-waves of the ERGs elicited by the standard flash, respectively. The amplitude of scotopic rod b-wave was significantly lower in groups 1 and 2 compared with control. In addition, the b-wave of the mixed rod-cone ERG was significantly smaller in group 2 than in the controls. Controls are the healthy fellow eyes of all the patients. The error bars represent the standard deviation.
Notes: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Abbreviation: ERG, electroretinogram.
Figure 5Average amplitudes of ERGs recorded under photopic condition in the two groups and the control fellow eyes. Only the PhNR is significantly different in group 1 from the controls. The controls are the healthy fellow eyes of all the patients. The error bars represent the standard deviation.
Notes: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Abbreviations: ERG, electroretinogram; PhNR, photopic negative response.