Literature DB >> 21339258

Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

Raymond H Mak1, Subba R Digumarthy, Alona Muzikansky, Jeffrey A Engelman, Jo-Anne O Shepard, Noah C Choi, Lecia V Sequist.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and computed tomography (CT) imaging characteristics in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified NSCLC patients who underwent EGFR mutation testing and pretreatment FDG-PET and CT scans. The maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)) of the primary tumor and any metastases was measured and normalized to the SUV of blood in the pulmonary artery. We compared normalized SUV(max) values between EGFR-mutant and wild-type patients and modeled radiographic and clinical predictors of EGFR mutation status. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify potential SUV cutoffs predictive of genotype.
RESULTS: We included 100 patients (24 EGFR-mutant and 76 wild-type). There was a trend for higher normalized SUV(max) in the primary tumors among patients with EGFR-wild-type versus mutant (median, 3.4; range, 0.6-12.8; versus median, 2.9; range, 0.4-5.0; p = .09). Normalized SUV(max) of nodal and distant metastases, and CT characteristics were not associated with genotype. On multivariate analysis, low normalized SUV(max) of the primary tumor was predictive for EGFR mutation (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.98; p = .034). ROC curve analyses yielded an area under the curve of 0.62, and identified a potential cutoff of ≥ 5.0 to distinguish wild-type from mutant tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, high FDG avidity (normalized SUV(max) ≥ 5) correlated with EGFR-wild-type genotype. Although genotyping remains the gold standard, further work to validate FDG-PET as a surrogate for tumor genotype may provide useful information in patients without available tumor tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21339258      PMCID: PMC3228101          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  28 in total

1.  Akt stimulates aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells.

Authors:  Rebecca L Elstrom; Daniel E Bauer; Monica Buzzai; Robyn Karnauskas; Marian H Harris; David R Plas; Hongming Zhuang; Ryan M Cinalli; Abass Alavi; Charles M Rudin; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  The glucose dependence of Akt-transformed cells can be reversed by pharmacologic activation of fatty acid beta-oxidation.

Authors:  Monica Buzzai; Daniel E Bauer; Russell G Jones; Ralph J Deberardinis; Georgia Hatzivassiliou; Rebecca L Elstrom; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum: prevalence and features on fusion 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT.

Authors:  Landon B Kuester; Alan J Fischman; Chieh-Min Fan; Elkan F Halpern; Suzanne L Aquino
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography pattern of pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Subba R Digumarthy; Alan J Fischman; Boon Han Kwek; Suzanne L Aquino
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from "never smokers" and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib.

Authors:  William Pao; Vincent Miller; Maureen Zakowski; Jennifer Doherty; Katerina Politi; Inderpal Sarkaria; Bhuvanesh Singh; Robert Heelan; Valerie Rusch; Lucinda Fulton; Elaine Mardis; Doris Kupfer; Richard Wilson; Mark Kris; Harold Varmus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy.

Authors:  J Guillermo Paez; Pasi A Jänne; Jeffrey C Lee; Sean Tracy; Heidi Greulich; Stacey Gabriel; Paula Herman; Frederic J Kaye; Neal Lindeman; Titus J Boggon; Katsuhiko Naoki; Hidefumi Sasaki; Yoshitaka Fujii; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib.

Authors:  Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction.

Authors:  K R Zasadny; R L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues.

Authors:  Nancy Paquet; Adelin Albert; Jacqueline Foidart; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Gefitinib-sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung cancer activate anti-apoptotic pathways.

Authors:  Raffaella Sordella; Daphne W Bell; Daniel A Haber; Jeffrey Settleman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  37 in total

1.  Prospective enterprise-level molecular genotyping of a cohort of cancer patients.

Authors:  Laura E MacConaill; Elizabeth Garcia; Priyanka Shivdasani; Matthew Ducar; Ravali Adusumilli; Marc Breneiser; Mark Byrne; Lawrence Chung; Jodie Conneely; Lauren Crosby; Levi A Garraway; Xin Gong; William C Hahn; Charlie Hatton; Philip W Kantoff; Michael Kluk; Frank Kuo; Yonghui Jia; Ruchi Joshi; Janina Longtine; Allison Manning; Emanuele Palescandolo; Nematullah Sharaf; Lynette Sholl; Paul van Hummelen; Jacqueline Wade; Bruce M Wollinson; Dimity Zepf; Barrett J Rollins; Neal I Lindeman
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Value of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and CEA level to predict epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kai-Hsiung Ko; Hsian-He Hsu; Tsai-Wang Huang; Hong-Wei Gao; Daniel H Y Shen; Wei-Chou Chang; Yi-Chih Hsu; Tsun-Hou Chang; Chi-Ming Chu; Ching-Liang Ho; Hung Chang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  PET-CT in the staging and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Ibeas; Blanca Cantos; José Manuel Gasent; Begoña Rodríguez; Mariano Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  18F-FDG uptake for prediction EGFR mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jian Guan; Nan J Xiao; Min Chen; Wen L Zhou; Yao W Zhang; Shuang Wang; Yong M Dai; Lu Li; Yue Zhang; Qin Y Li; Xiang Z Li; Mi Yang; Hu B Wu; Long H Chen; Lai Y Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  The added value of quantitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters in the assessment of pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis in lung cancer.

Authors:  Dexter P Mendoza; Subba R Digumarthy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Correlation between (18)f-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Yun-Jung Choi; Byoung Chul Cho; Yong Hyu Jeong; Hyo Jung Seo; Hyun Jeong Kim; Arthur Cho; Jae Hoon Lee; Mijin Yun; Tae Joo Jeon; Jong Doo Lee; Won Jun Kang
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-06-07

7.  Role of [¹⁸F]FDG PET in prediction of KRAS and EGFR mutation status in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Carlos Caicedo; Maria Jose Garcia-Velloso; Maria Dolores Lozano; Tania Labiano; Carmen Vigil Diaz; Jose Maria Lopez-Picazo; Alfonso Gurpide; Javier J Zulueta; Javier Zulueta; Jose Angel Richter Echevarria; Jose Luis Perez Gracia
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis predict prognosis in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Chung; Kye Young Lee; Hee Joung Kim; Wan Seop Kim; Young So
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Associations Between Somatic Mutations and Metabolic Imaging Phenotypes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Stephen S F Yip; John Kim; Thibaud P Coroller; Chintan Parmar; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Elizabeth Huynh; Raymond H Mak; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in rectal cancer: relationship with the RAS mutational status.

Authors:  Pierre Lovinfosse; Benjamin Koopmansch; Frederic Lambert; Sébastien Jodogne; Gaelle Kustermans; Mathieu Hatt; Dimitris Visvikis; Laurence Seidel; Marc Polus; Adelin Albert; Philippe Delvenne; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.