Literature DB >> 21337549

Predicting local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for early stage breast cancer: the significance of a narrow (≤ 2 mm) surgical resection margin.

Gary Groot1, Henrike Rees, Punam Pahwa, Sivaruban Kanagaratnam, Mary Kinloch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Controversy continues over the extent of surgical resection margin required to minimize the risk of local recurrence (LR) in breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for early stage breast cancer. This study explores whether or not a narrow (≤ 2 mm) but negative resection margin affects LR.
METHODS: All patients registered at the Saskatoon Cancer Center between January 1, 1991 and December 31, 2000 with a diagnosis of early stage invasive duct carcinoma treated with BCT were examined. All charts and pathology reports were reviewed with a review of the pathology for all cases where the resection margin was unclear in the original report. Other factors known or thought to effect LR (age, radiation boost, grade, extensive DCIS, ER/PR receptor status) were considered in the statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Amongst the 200 narrow margin cases 19 LR were detected (19/201 = 9.5%) while 52 LR were detected in the 491 wide margin cases (52/491 =10.6%). This difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: A narrow (≤ 2 mm) surgical resection margin does not result in an increase in LR compared to a surgical resection margin 2 mm in BCT for early stage duct carcinoma and does not warrant re-excision.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21337549     DOI: 10.1002/jso.21826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  7 in total

Review 1.  What is a clear margin in breast conserving cancer surgery?

Authors:  Helen Krontiras; Rachael B Lancaster; Marshall M Urist
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-03

2.  Efficacy of intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis of lumpectomy margins during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Tomofumi Osako; Reiki Nishimura; Yasuyuki Nishiyama; Yasuhiro Okumura; Rumiko Tashima; Masahiro Nakano; Mamiko Fujisue; Yasuo Toyozumi; Nobuyuki Arima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Effect of margin width on local recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Alice Ho; Emily Orell; Michelle Stempel; Yu Chen; Anne Eaton; Sujata Patil; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Safe negative margin width in breast conservative therapy: results from a population with a high percentage of negative prognostic factors.

Authors:  Abu Bakar Bhatti; Amina Khan; Narjis Muzaffar; Neelam Siddiqui; Aamir Syed; Mazhar Shah; Awais Aamir; Arif Jamshed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Petra Macaskill; M Luke Marinovich; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Extent of primary breast cancer surgery: standards and individualized concepts.

Authors:  Joerg Heil; Valerie Fuchs; Michael Golatta; Sarah Schott; Markus Wallwiener; Christoph Domschke; Peter Sinn; Michael P Lux; Christof Sohn; Florian Schütz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Breast conservation surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Jonathan White; Raj Achuthan; Philip Turton; Mark Lansdown
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-09-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.