Literature DB >> 21337531

Epidemiology of borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pediatric cystic fibrosis.

Timothy Ronan Leahy1, Yvonne C W Yau, Eshetu Atenafu, Mary Corey, Felix Ratjen, Valerie Waters.   

Abstract

A single-center retrospective study was undertaken in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) to evaluate (1) risk factors for acquisition; (2) molecular epidemiology; and (3) impact on disease progression of borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) versus mecA-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The study comprised of (1) identification of all children with at least one respiratory specimen positive for either BORSA or MRSA during the study period; (2) compilation of relevant clinical and epidemiological data from 12-month period leading up to first positive (index) culture; (3) microbiological and molecular characterization of index isolates and (4) measurement of subsequent clinical outcome. Thirty-eight children were identified with at least one positive isolate; 4 were excluded due to insufficient clinical or laboratory data. Eighteen children (53%) grew BORSA in their index culture. Children who acquired BORSA only (n = 16) were more likely to have had prior MSSA colonization (P < 0.0001). Usage of oral cephalexin (P < 0.01) and inhaled tobramycin (P < 0.03) prior to index culture was significantly and independently associated with acquisition of BORSA. The majority of BORSA isolates were hyper β-lactamase producers and susceptible to a greater range of antibiotics. Strain relatedness was not evident within the BORSA group. There was no difference in disease progression between the two groups. This is the first study to demonstrate that a significant proportion of S. aureus isolates with methicillin resistance in the CF population are BORSAs that lack mecA. Antibiotic pressure may lead to the development of BORSA in CF patients. Prospective studies are needed to assess its clinical impact.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mecA; methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21337531     DOI: 10.1002/ppul.21383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol        ISSN: 1099-0496


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) strains isolated in Tunisia.

Authors:  Senda Mezghani Maalej; Faouzia Mahjoubi Rhimi; Marguerite Fines; Basma Mnif; Roland Leclercq; Adnene Hammami
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Genetic Diversity among Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Showing Oxacillin and/or Cefoxitin Resistance Not Linked to the Presence of mec Genes.

Authors:  M Angeles Argudín; S Roisin; L Nienhaus; M Dodémont; R de Mendonça; C Nonhoff; A Deplano; O Denis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical specimens from cystic fibrosis patients by use of chromogenic selective agar.

Authors:  Leandro Reus Rodrigues Perez; Ana Lúcia Souza Antunes; Jéssica Weiss Bonfanti; Jaqueline Becker Pinto; Eliane Wurdig Roesch; Diógenes Rodrigues; Cícero Armídio Gomes Dias
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Mutations in the gdpP gene are a clinically relevant mechanism for β-lactam resistance in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lacking mec determinants.

Authors:  Anna Sommer; Stephan Fuchs; Franziska Layer; Christoph Schaudinn; Robert E Weber; Hugues Richard; Mareike B Erdmann; Michael Laue; Christopher F Schuster; Guido Werner; Birgit Strommenger
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2021-09

5.  Comparative Genomics of Borderline Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Detected during a Pseudo-outbreak of Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Sanjam S Sawhney; Eric M Ransom; Meghan A Wallace; Patrick J Reich; Gautam Dantas; Carey-Ann D Burnham
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 7.867

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.