Lorien C Abroms1, Nalini Padmanabhan, Lalida Thaweethai, Todd Phillips. 1. Department of Prevention and Community Health, George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, 2175 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20037, USA. Lorien@gwu.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the proliferation of smartphones such as the iPhone, mobile phones are being used in novel ways to promote smoking cessation. PURPOSE: This study set out to examine the content of the 47 iPhone applications (apps) for smoking cessation that were distributed through the online iTunes store, as of June 24, 2009. METHODS: Each app was independently coded by two reviewers for its (1) approach to smoking cessation and (2) adherence to the U.S. Public Health Service's 2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. Each app was also coded for its (3) frequency of downloads. RESULTS: Apps identified for smoking cessation were found to have low levels of adherence to key guidelines in the index. Few, if any, apps recommended or linked the user to proven treatments such as pharmacotherapy, counseling, and/or a quitline. CONCLUSIONS: iPhone apps for smoking cessation rarely adhere to established guidelines for smoking cessation. It is recommended that current apps be revised and future apps be developed around evidence-based practices for smoking cessation.
BACKGROUND: With the proliferation of smartphones such as the iPhone, mobile phones are being used in novel ways to promote smoking cessation. PURPOSE: This study set out to examine the content of the 47 iPhone applications (apps) for smoking cessation that were distributed through the online iTunes store, as of June 24, 2009. METHODS: Each app was independently coded by two reviewers for its (1) approach to smoking cessation and (2) adherence to the U.S. Public Health Service's 2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. Each app was also coded for its (3) frequency of downloads. RESULTS: Apps identified for smoking cessation were found to have low levels of adherence to key guidelines in the index. Few, if any, apps recommended or linked the user to proven treatments such as pharmacotherapy, counseling, and/or a quitline. CONCLUSIONS: iPhone apps for smoking cessation rarely adhere to established guidelines for smoking cessation. It is recommended that current apps be revised and future apps be developed around evidence-based practices for smoking cessation.
Authors: Cathy L Backinger; Amber Thornton-Bullock; Cindy Miner; C Tracy Orleans; Karen Siener; Carlo C DiClemente; Todd M Phillips; Jessica N Rowden; Elaine Arkin Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jaimee L Heffner; Roger Vilardaga; Laina D Mercer; Julie A Kientz; Jonathan B Bricker Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Lora E Burke; Jun Ma; Kristen M J Azar; Gary G Bennett; Eric D Peterson; Yaguang Zheng; William Riley; Janna Stephens; Svati H Shah; Brian Suffoletto; Tanya N Turan; Bonnie Spring; Julia Steinberger; Charlene C Quinn Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David B Buller; Ron Borland; Erwin P Bettinghaus; James H Shane; Donald E Zimmerman Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Michael A Sanchez; Borsika A Rabin; Bridget Gaglio; Michelle Henton; M Khair Elzarrad; Peyton Purcell; Russell E Glasgow Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Beth Bock; Rochelle Rosen; Herpreet Thind; Nancy Barnett; Kristen Walaska; Victoria Cobb Journal: Proc Annu Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci Date: 2014-01
Authors: John D Piette; Ann-Marie Rosland; Nicolle S Marinec; Dana Striplin; Steven J Bernstein; Maria J Silveira Journal: Med Care Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.983