Literature DB >> 21335016

The role of biased competition in visual short-term memory.

Kimron L Shapiro1, Claire E Miller.   

Abstract

Despite being extensively studied, many important questions regarding visual short-term memory (VSTM) are yet to be fully answered. The present review seeks to explore the extent to which competitive interactions present during perception of stimuli may also operate during stimulus encoding and/or maintenance in VSTM. Additionally, the paper provides an overview of the methods and approaches that have been used to study the properties of VSTM, and a review of research into the limits of VSTM capacity. We take as our starting point the biased competition model of attention (Desimone & Duncan, 1995) and discuss the influence that such competition may have on the limited capacity of VSTM by a review of the literature and by recent experiments from Shapiro's lab. The present report outlines several experiments that provide results consistent with the idea that low-level competitive interactions may influence VSTM, with the aim of stimulating further research into this new area.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21335016     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  12 in total

1.  Individual differences reveal limited mixed-category effects during a visual working memory task.

Authors:  Ryan E B Mruczek; Kyle W Killebrew; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 2.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Electrophysiological measurement of the effect of inter-stimulus competition on early cortical stages of human vision.

Authors:  Claire E Miller; Kimron L Shapiro; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Modeling the Effects of Perceptual Load: Saliency, Competitive Interactions, and Top-Down Biases.

Authors:  Kleanthis Neokleous; Andria Shimi; Marios N Avraamides
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-26

5.  Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation.

Authors:  Jumana Ahmad; Garrett Swan; Howard Bowman; Brad Wyble; Anna C Nobre; Kimron L Shapiro; Fiona McNab
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Multiple visual objects are sampled sequentially.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Marlies E Vissers
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Protecting visual short-term memory during maintenance: Attentional modulation of target and distractor representations.

Authors:  Marlies E Vissers; Rasa Gulbinaite; Tijl van den Bos; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Attention Matters: Pitch vs. Pattern Processing in Adolescence.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-10

9.  Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Ana Torralbo; Evelina Tapia; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-10

10.  Neural mechanisms by which attention modulates the comparison of remembered and perceptual representations.

Authors:  Bo-Cheng Kuo; Duncan E Astle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.