Literature DB >> 21334684

Urethral distortion after placement of synthetic mid urethral sling.

Sunshine Murray1, Rashel M Haverkorn, Yvonne K P Koch, Gary E Lemack, Philippe E Zimmern.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We retrospectively compared preoperative characteristics in patients with new onset lower urinary tract symptoms after receiving a mid urethral sling who did (group 1) and did not (group 2) have radiographically confirmed urethral distortion during voiding.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After receiving institutional review board approval we reviewed the charts of patients who underwent mid urethral sling excision for new onset lower urinary tract symptoms between January 2003 and July 2009. We collected demographic and questionnaire data, including the Urogenital Distress Inventory, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and visual analog scale (score 0 to 10) for quality of life, and preoperative urodynamics data, including maximum flow, detrusor pressure at maximum flow and post-void residual urine. Lateral voiding cystourethrogram was done with the patient standing.
RESULTS: Of 87 operable patients 23 were excluded from analysis due to lack of a voiding cystourethrogram (16) or of the voiding phase on voiding cystourethrogram (7). Groups 1 and 2 consisted of 51 and 13 patients, respectively. Age, time to sling excision, and Urogenital Distress Inventory, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and quality of life scores were not significantly different between the groups. Preoperative urodynamic parameters in 37 group 1 and 7 group 2 patients revealed a mean detrusor pressure at maximum flow of 31.1 and 22.2 cm H(2)O, respectively (p = 0.25). Mean preoperative maximum flow was 13.4 and 15.4 ml per second (p = 0.59), and median post-void residual urine was 45.5 and 8.3, ml respectively (p = 0.16).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar baseline symptoms and uroflow characteristics patients with urethral distortion had 50% higher detrusor pressure and greater post-void residual urine than those without urethral distortion. Flow rate alone may be insufficient to predict the impact of the mid urethral sling on bladder function in patients with new onset lower urinary tract symptoms.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21334684     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  Sling-related urethral distortion.

Authors:  Sarah Payton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Management of two synthetic midurethral slings eroded into the urethral lumen.

Authors:  Benjamin E Dillon; Philippe E Zimmern
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Female stress urinary incontinence and the mid-urethral sling: is obstruction necessary to achieve dryness?

Authors:  Amy D Dobberfuhl; Elise J B De
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Clinical applications of pelvic floor imaging: opinion statement endorsed by the society of abdominal radiology (SAR), American Urological Association (AUA), and American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS).

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Joshua Bleier; Mariya Kobi; Ian Paquette; Milana Flusberg; Philippe Zimmern; Larissa V Rodriguez; Phyllis Glanc; Suzanne Palmer; Luz Maria Rodriguez; Marsha K Guess; Milena M Weinstein; Roopa Ram; Kedar Jambhekar; Gaurav Khatri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.