Literature DB >> 21334663

Long-term experience and outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children and young adults.

Brian J Minnillo1, Jose A S Cruz, Rogerio H Sayao, Carlo C Passerotti, Constance S Houck, Petra M Meier, Joseph G Borer, David A Diamond, Alan B Retik, Hiep T Nguyen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is one of the more common robotic assisted procedures performed in children. However, data regarding long-term experience and clinical outcomes for this procedure are limited. We evaluated the long-term outcomes in a large series of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty at a teaching institution, and the effect of a collaborative program between the robotic surgeons, surgical nurses and anesthesiologists on overall operative time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 155 patients who underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty between 2002 and 2009. Operative data, including surgical approach, type of procedure, total and specific operative times and placement of ureteral stents, were determined. Postoperative outcome measurements, including duration of hospital stay, duration of Foley catheter drainage, radiological findings and any subsequent complications, were assessed.
RESULTS: Mean operative time and length of hospitalization decreased significantly by the end of the study. At a mean followup of 31.7 months the primary success rate was 96% (hydronephrosis was improved in 85% of patients and stable in 11%). The complication rate was 11%, and recurrent obstruction requiring redo robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty or open pyeloplasty developed in 3% of patients. Success rate and complication rate were unchanged during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that even within the confines of a pediatric urology training program successful collaboration between robotic surgeons, surgical nurses and anesthesiologists can lead to shorter operative times and hospital stays. Long-term surgical success and complication rates were comparable to open surgery.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21334663     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  35 in total

1.  [Pyeloplasty - pro robotic-assisted].

Authors:  Z Akçetin; S Siemer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Education and training in pediatric robotic surgery: lessons learned from an inaugural multinational workshop.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Erik K Mayer; Juan I Camps; Lars H Olsen; Gloria Pelizzo; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi; Azad S Najmaldin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-10-17

3.  Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Michael V Hollis; Patricia S Cho; Richard N Yu
Journal:  Am J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-12

4.  Evaluation of robotic-assisted laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  P Murthy; J A Cohn; M S Gundeti
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic urological surgery in children.

Authors:  Luís F Sávio; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  National Trends in Secondary Procedures Following Pediatric Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Geolani W Dy; Ryan S Hsi; Sarah K Holt; Thomas S Lendvay; John L Gore; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Current trends in minimally invasive reconstructive urology.

Authors:  I Belibasakis; G Kolostoumpis; K Makrygiannaki
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-11-05

8.  Instituting robotic pediatric urologic surgery in the Canadian healthcare system: Evaluating the feasibility and outcomes of robot-assisted pyeloplasty and ureteric reimplantation.

Authors:  Noah Stern; Peter Wang; Sumit Dave
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Can proctoring affect the learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty? Experience at a high-volume pediatric robotic surgery center.

Authors:  Diana K Bowen; Bruce W Lindgren; Earl Y Cheng; Edward M Gong
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-24

10.  Outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty procedures: a series of 18 patients.

Authors:  Kemal Ener; Serkan Altınova; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Muhammet Fuat Özcan; Erem Asil; Emre Ürer; Ali Fuat Atmaca; Ziya Akbulut
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.