Literature DB >> 21334385

Preferential ligation during TA-cloning of multitemplate PCR products--a factor causing bias in microbial community structure analysis.

Márton Palatinszky1, Marcell Nikolausz, Domonkos Sváb, Károly Márialigeti.   

Abstract

The description of microbial community structure is always biased by the selectivity of the methods applied. Although TA cloning of PCR amplified community DNA is one of the most widely used techniques in bacterial community analysis, no thorough comparative testing has been carried out on different TA cloning systems. In this study, we measured and compared the selectivity of two widely used TA-cloning kits in experimental setups where the length heterogeneity of the inserts modeled the natural length variation of the 16S rRNA gene and the 16S-23S intergenic spacer region. Both TOPO TA (Invitrogen, CA USA) and pGem-T vector system (Promega, WI USA) cloning kits showed significant and reproducible insert size related selectivity. The effect of ligation time and temperature was also studied in case of the pGem-T vector system. We compared the performance of the two cloning kits on an environmental sample, along with a semiquantitative community fingerprinting method to gain reference data free of cloning bias. The two clone libraries showed significantly different compositions, and were also differing from the community structure revealed by length heterogeneity PCR.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21334385     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of morphological and molecular genetic quantification of relative abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi within roots.

Authors:  P Shi; L K Abbott; N C Banning; B Zhao
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Culture-dependent and -independent investigations of microbial diversity on urinary catheters.

Authors:  Yijuan Xu; Claus Moser; Waleed Abu Al-Soud; Søren Sørensen; Niels Høiby; Per Halkjær Nielsen; Trine Rolighed Thomsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Unique picoeukaryotic algal community under multiple environmental stress conditions in a shallow, alkaline pan.

Authors:  Károly Pálffy; Tamás Felföldi; Anikó Mentes; Hajnalka Horváth; Károly Márialigeti; Emil Boros; Lajos Vörös; Boglárka Somogyi
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Fast and easy method for construction of plasmid vectors using modified quick-change mutagenesis.

Authors:  Jin Woo Bok; Nancy P Keller
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

5.  Assessment of microbial diversity in biofilms recovered from endotracheal tubes using culture dependent and independent approaches.

Authors:  Ilse Vandecandelaere; Nele Matthijs; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Dieter Deforce; Peter Vosters; Liesbet De Bus; Hans J Nelis; Pieter Depuydt; Tom Coenye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Analysis of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing options on the Roche/454 next-generation titanium sequencing platform.

Authors:  Hideyuki Tamaki; Chris L Wright; Xiangzhen Li; Qiaoyan Lin; Chiachi Hwang; Shiping Wang; Jyothi Thimmapuram; Yoichi Kamagata; Wen-Tso Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of bacterial culture and 16S rRNA community profiling by clonal analysis and pyrosequencing for the characterization of the dentine caries-associated microbiome.

Authors:  Kathrin Schulze-Schweifing; Avijit Banerjee; William G Wade
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.293

8.  Underestimation of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria abundance by amplification bias in amoA-targeted qPCR.

Authors:  Arnaud Dechesne; Sanin Musovic; Alejandro Palomo; Vaibhav Diwan; Barth F Smets
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.813

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.