Literature DB >> 21332617

Collaboration and co-ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team.

Christi J Nierse1, Karen Schipper, Ezra van Zadelhoff, Joos van de Griendt, Tineke A Abma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different strategies by which patients can be involved in research include consultation, control and collaboration. This article focuses on collaboration within research teams and considers this with reference to a research project about setting a social-scientific agenda for health research from the perspectives of patients with a chronic kidney disease (CKD).
OBJECTIVE: To examine the dynamics and dialogues in a collaboration between patient research partners and professional researchers.
DESIGN: A responsive methodology was used in the research project. Two patient research partners participated in the research team. Twenty-seven patients with CKD and parents of young children with CKD were interviewed, seven focus groups were organized and observations were held at a dialysis centre.
RESULTS: During the collaboration, the research partners and professional researchers engaged in a mutual learning process in all stages of the project. The professional researchers gave the research partners a sense of ownership in the research process. The research partners could relate to the lives of patients by using their experiential knowledge. In the context of collaborative working, this helped shape an agenda for research. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The active involvement of patients as research partners can add value to a research strategy, especially when research partners and professional researchers engage in a dialogue that is open, inclusive and deliberative. Issues for discussion include the possibility of 'over-involvement', the research profile and training of research partners and whether participation of patients is restricted to certain types of research.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21332617      PMCID: PMC5060620          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  38 in total

1.  'Having a say': negotiation in fourth-generation evaluation.

Authors:  T Koch
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer.

Authors:  D Tallon; J Chard; P Dieppe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-06-10       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  What does involving consumers in research mean?

Authors:  C Williamson
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2001-12

4.  Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas.

Authors:  Tineke A Abma; Jacqueline E W Broerse
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits.

Authors:  Sarah Hewlett; Maarten de Wit; Pam Richards; Enid Quest; Rod Hughes; Turid Heiberg; John Kirwan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-08-15

6.  Polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  K Schipper; Tineke A Abma; Ronald J Hené; Guy A M Widdershoven
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-05-11

7.  The identification of topics for research that are important to people with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Mark R Welfare; Jackie Colligan; Sam Molyneux; Pauline Pearson; J Roger Barton
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.566

8.  How we live: participatory research with six people with learning difficulties.

Authors:  M Richardson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  What patients want: consumer involvement in the design of a randomized controlled trial of routine oxygen supplementation after acute stroke.

Authors:  Khalid Ali; Christine Roffe; Peter Crome
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Patient and clinician collaboration in the design of a national randomized breast cancer trial.

Authors:  Jo Marsden; Jane Bradburn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  33 in total

1.  User involvement in long-term care. Towards a relational care-ethics approach.

Authors:  Tineke A Abma; Vivianne E Baur
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Introducing this issue.

Authors:  Jonathan Tritter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  An analysis of the Research Team-Service User relationship from the Service User perspective: a consideration of 'The Three Rs' (Roles, Relations, and Responsibilities) for healthcare research organisations.

Authors:  Melanie Jordan; Emma Rowley; Richard Morriss; Nick Manning
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  The Benefits of Patient Involvement for Translational Research.

Authors:  Lieke van der Scheer; Elisa Garcia; Anna Laura van der Laan; Simone van der Burg; Marianne Boenink
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2017-09

Review 5.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Seeking connections, creating movement: the power of altruistic action.

Authors:  Tineke A Abma; Vivianne Baur
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2014-12

Review 7.  Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.

Authors:  Nathan D Shippee; Juan Pablo Domecq Garces; Gabriela J Prutsky Lopez; Zhen Wang; Tarig A Elraiyah; Mohammed Nabhan; Juan P Brito; Kasey Boehmer; Rim Hasan; Belal Firwana; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  "If i wasn't this robust": patients' expectations and experiences at the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Conference 2010.

Authors:  Maarten P T de Wit; Marije S Koelewijn-van Loon; Sarah Collins; Tineke A Abma; John Kirwan
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Do not forget the professional--the value of the FIRST model for guiding the structural involvement of patients in rheumatology research.

Authors:  Maarten P T de Wit; Janneke E Elberse; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Tineke A Abma
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Patient involvement in research programming and implementation: A responsive evaluation of the Dialogue Model for research agenda setting.

Authors:  Tineke A Abma; Carina A C M Pittens; Merel Visse; Janneke E Elberse; Jacqueline E W Broerse
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.