Literature DB >> 21331672

How does our search engine "see" the world? The case of amodal completion.

Jeremy M Wolfe1, Ester Reijnen, Todd S Horowitz, Riccardo Pedersini, Yair Pinto, Johan Hulleman.   

Abstract

This article illustrates a dissociation between the perceived attributes of an object and the ability of those attributes to guide the deployment of attention in visual search. Orientation is an attribute that guides search. Thus, a vertical line will "pop out" amid horizontal distractors. Amodal completion can create perceptually convincing oriented stimuli when two elements appear to form a complete object partially hidden behind an occluder. Previous work (e.g., Rensink & Enns, Vision Research, 38, 2489-2505, 1998) has shown a preattentive role for amodal completion in search tasks. Here, we show that orientation based on perceptually compelling amodal completion may fail to guide attention. The broader conclusion is that introspection is a poor guide to the capabilities of our internal search engine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21331672      PMCID: PMC3090510          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0103-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  31 in total

Review 1.  Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing.

Authors:  R A Rensink
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions.

Authors:  J Krummenacher; H J Müller; D Heller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

3.  Asymmetries in visual search: an introduction.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

4.  Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

Review 5.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Color names, color categories, and color-cued visual search: sometimes, color perception is not categorical.

Authors:  Angela M Brown; Delwin T Lindsey; Kevin M Guckes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.

Authors:  A Treisman; J Souther
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1985-09

10.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets.

Authors:  H E Egeth; R A Virzi; H Garbart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  Are summary statistics enough? Evidence for the importance of shape in guiding visual search.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Joseph Schmidt; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-04-01

2.  Occluded information is restored at preview but not during visual search.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.