Literature DB >> 21330399

Differentiation between glioblastomas, solitary brain metastases, and primary cerebral lymphomas using diffusion tensor and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

S Wang1, S Kim, S Chawla, R L Wolf, D E Knipp, A Vossough, D M O'Rourke, K D Judy, H Poptani, E R Melhem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Glioblastomas, brain metastases, and PCLs may have similar enhancement patterns on MR imaging, making the differential diagnosis difficult or even impossible. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a combination of DTI and DSC can assist in the differentiation of glioblastomas, solitary brain metastases, and PCLs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six glioblastomas, 25 brain metastases, and 16 PCLs were retrospectively identified. DTI metrics, including FA, ADC, CL, CP, CS, and rCBV were measured from the enhancing, immediate peritumoral and distant peritumoral regions. A 2-level decision tree was designed, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used at each level to determine the best model for classification.
RESULTS: From the enhancing region, significantly elevated FA, CL, and CP and decreased CS values were observed in glioblastomas compared with brain metastases and PCLs (P < .001), whereas ADC, rCBV, and rCBV(max) values of glioblastomas were significantly higher than those of PCLs (P < .01). The best model to distinguish glioblastomas from nonglioblastomas consisted of ADC, CS (or FA) from the enhancing region, and rCBV from the immediate peritumoral region, resulting in AUC = 0.938. The best predictor to differentiate PCLs from brain metastases comprised ADC from the enhancing region and CP from the immediate peritumoral region with AUC = 0.909.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of DTI metrics and rCBV measurement can help in the differentiation of glioblastomas from brain metastases and PCLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21330399      PMCID: PMC8013110          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  45 in total

Review 1.  Processing and visualization for diffusion tensor MRI.

Authors:  C-F Westin; S E Maier; H Mamata; A Nabavi; F A Jolesz; R Kikinis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Can we differentiate true white matter fibers from pseudofibers inside a brain abscess cavity using geometrical diffusion tensor imaging metrics?

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Rakesh K Gupta; Kavindra Nath; R K S Rathore; Getaneh Bayu; Richa Trivedi; Mazhar Husain; Kashi N Prasad; R P Tripathi; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 3.  Neuroimaging in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Soonmee Cha
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Magnetic resonance findings of primary central nervous system T-cell lymphoma in immunocompetent patients.

Authors:  E Y Kim; S S Kim
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma multiforme: differences in diffusion characteristics evaluated with diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  C-H Toh; M Castillo; A M-C Wong; K-C Wei; H-F Wong; S-H Ng; Y-L Wan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Diffusion tensor MRI in rat models of invasive and well-demarcated brain tumors.

Authors:  Sungheon Kim; Stephen Pickup; Oliver Hsu; Harish Poptani
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in enhancing malignant cerebral tumors.

Authors:  Cem Calli; Omer Kitis; Nilgun Yunten; Taskin Yurtseven; Sertac Islekel; Taner Akalin
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings.

Authors:  H J Aronen; I E Gazit; D N Louis; B R Buchbinder; F S Pardo; R M Weisskoff; G R Harsh; G R Cosgrove; E F Halpern; F H Hochberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  DTI derived indices correlate with immunohistochemistry obtained matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-9) expression in cellular fraction of brain tuberculoma.

Authors:  Rakesh K Gupta; Mohammad Haris; Nuzhat Husain; Sona Saksena; Mazhar Husain; Ram K S Rathore
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 3.181

10.  Diffusion tensor and tensor metrics imaging in intracranial epidermoid cysts.

Authors:  Kannath Santhosh; Bejoy Thomas; Vishnupuri V Radhakrishnan; Jitender Saini; Chandrasekharan Kesavadas; Arun Kumar Gupta; Tirur Raman Kapilamoorthy; Suresh N Nair
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  63 in total

1.  Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphomas from high-grade gliomas by rCBV and percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging.

Authors:  Z Xing; R X You; J Li; Y Liu; D R Cao
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  Prognostic Value of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Patients with Glioblastomas.

Authors:  G Çoban; S Mohan; F Kural; S Wang; D M O'Rourke; H Poptani
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Role of rCBV values derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating CNS lymphoma from high grade glioma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruofei Liang; Mao Li; Xiang Wang; Jiewen Luo; Yuan Yang; Qing Mao; Yanhui Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

4.  Differentiation of solitary brain metastasis from glioblastoma multiforme: a predictive multiparametric approach using combined MR diffusion and perfusion.

Authors:  Adam Herman Bauer; William Erly; Franklin G Moser; Marcel Maya; Kambiz Nael
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Association of dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced MR Perfusion parameters with prognosis in elderly patients with glioblastomas.

Authors:  Pejman Jabehdar Maralani; Elias R Melhem; Sumei Wang; Edward H Herskovits; Matthew R Voluck; Sang Joon Kim; Kim O Learned; Donald M O'Rourke; Suyash Mohan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Radiomics features to distinguish glioblastoma from primary central nervous system lymphoma on multi-parametric MRI.

Authors:  Yikyung Kim; Hwan-Ho Cho; Sung Tae Kim; Hyunjin Park; Dohyun Nam; Doo-Sik Kong
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Diagnostic utility of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating glioblastomas from brain metastases.

Authors:  S Wang; S J Kim; H Poptani; J H Woo; S Mohan; R Jin; M R Voluck; D M O'Rourke; R L Wolf; E R Melhem; S Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of solitary brain metastases: main findings of nonmorphological sequences.

Authors:  S Gaudino; G M Di Lella; R Russo; V S Lo Russo; F Piludu; F R Quaglio; M R Gualano; C De Waure; C Colosimo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Assessment of diffusion tensor imaging metrics in differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Lamiaa El-Serougy; Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Amani Ezzat; Hany Eldawoody; Ahmad El-Morsy
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2016-08-25

10.  Differentiation between brain glioblastoma multiforme and solitary metastasis: qualitative and quantitative analysis based on routine MR imaging.

Authors:  X Z Chen; X M Yin; L Ai; Q Chen; S W Li; J P Dai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.