INTRODUCTION: Both full and brief versions of the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence are promising new measurement tools for studying tobacco dependence. We assessed the psychometric properties and construct validity of the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM)-68 and WISDM-37. METHODS: Participants were adult, treatment-seeking Hungarian daily smokers (N = 720) with Internet access who were also registered on a smoking cessation Web site. Using confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs), we tested the measurement models of both WISDM-68 and WISDM-37, internal consistency of subscales of WISDM-37, and gender invariance. We tested the associations between heaviness of smoking, tobacco dependence symptoms, smoking environment, and subscales of WISDM-37. RESULTS: Although the measurement model of WISDM-68 did not fit adequately, the measurement model of WISDM-37, including 11 correlating factors (affiliative attachment, automaticity, loss of control, cognitive enhancement, craving, cue exposure/associative processes, social/environmental goads, taste, tolerance, weight control, affective enhancement), satisfactorily represents the data. Latent structures are equal in both genders. Internal consistency of subscales of WISDM-37 ranges between 0.67 and 0.90. Tobacco dependence symptoms were significantly linked with all motives, heaviness of smoking was related significantly only to affiliative attachment, automaticity, loss of control, cognitive enhancement, craving, and tolerance, while tobacco dependence symptoms and gender were controlled. Gender was associated only with the weight control motive. CONCLUSIONS: Concurring with previous reports using other types of sample, WISDM-37 has sufficient psychometric properties and good construct validity to make it useful in measuring the multidimensional nature of tobacco dependence even in Internet-based research. Without precedent, gender equality of WISDM-37 is also supported.
INTRODUCTION: Both full and brief versions of the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence are promising new measurement tools for studying tobacco dependence. We assessed the psychometric properties and construct validity of the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM)-68 and WISDM-37. METHODS:Participants were adult, treatment-seeking Hungarian daily smokers (N = 720) with Internet access who were also registered on a smoking cessation Web site. Using confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs), we tested the measurement models of both WISDM-68 and WISDM-37, internal consistency of subscales of WISDM-37, and gender invariance. We tested the associations between heaviness of smoking, tobacco dependence symptoms, smoking environment, and subscales of WISDM-37. RESULTS: Although the measurement model of WISDM-68 did not fit adequately, the measurement model of WISDM-37, including 11 correlating factors (affiliative attachment, automaticity, loss of control, cognitive enhancement, craving, cue exposure/associative processes, social/environmental goads, taste, tolerance, weight control, affective enhancement), satisfactorily represents the data. Latent structures are equal in both genders. Internal consistency of subscales of WISDM-37 ranges between 0.67 and 0.90. Tobacco dependence symptoms were significantly linked with all motives, heaviness of smoking was related significantly only to affiliative attachment, automaticity, loss of control, cognitive enhancement, craving, and tolerance, while tobacco dependence symptoms and gender were controlled. Gender was associated only with the weight control motive. CONCLUSIONS: Concurring with previous reports using other types of sample, WISDM-37 has sufficient psychometric properties and good construct validity to make it useful in measuring the multidimensional nature of tobacco dependence even in Internet-based research. Without precedent, gender equality of WISDM-37 is also supported.
Authors: Megan E Piper; Thomas M Piasecki; E Belle Federman; Daniel M Bolt; Stevens S Smith; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Eve M Sledjeski; Lisa C Dierker; Darcé Costello; Saul Shiffman; Eric Donny; Brian R Flay Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2006-08-22 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Izilda Carolina de Meneses-Gaya; Antonio Waldo Zuardi; Sonia Regina Loureiro; José Alexandre de Souza Crippa Journal: J Bras Pneumol Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.624
Authors: Megan E Piper; Daniel M Bolt; Su-Young Kim; Sandra J Japuntich; Stevens S Smith; Jeff Niederdeppe; Dale S Cannon; Timothy B Baker Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2008-11
Authors: Sarah E Adkison; Vaughan W Rees; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Richard J O'Connor Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-05-25 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Yessenia Castro; Virmarie Correa-Fernández; Miguel Á Cano; Carlos Mazas; Karla Gonzalez; Damon J Vidrine; Jennifer I Vidrine; David W Wetter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Nicole L Nollen; Lisa Sanderson Cox; Matthew S Mayo; Edward F Ellerbeck; Sheshadri Madhusudhana; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-05-19 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Csilla Ágoston; Róbert Urbán; Orsolya Király; Mark D Griffiths; Peter J Rogers; Zsolt Demetrovics Journal: Int J Ment Health Addict Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 3.836