Literature DB >> 21329959

The effect of anoxia and anaerobia on ciliate community in biological nutrient removal systems using laboratory-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs).

Donata Dubber1, N F Gray.   

Abstract

Little is known about the effect of anaerobic and anoxic stages on the protozoan community in the activated sludge process and how this subsequently affects performance. Using a laboratory-scale BNR system the effect of different periods of anoxia on both the protozoan community and performance efficiency have been examined. Four SBRs were operated at two cycles per day using a range of combined anoxic/anaerobic periods (0, 60, 120 and 200 min). Effluent quality (TOC, BOD, TP, TN, NH(4)-N, NO(3)-N and NO(2)-N), sludge settleability and ciliate community (species diversity and abundance) were analysed over a periods of up to 24 days of operation. The species richness and total abundance of ciliates were found to decrease with longer anoxic/anaerobic periods. Both, positive and negative significant correlations between the abundance of certain species and the period of anoxia was observed (e.g. Opercularia microdiscum, Epicarchesium granulatum), although other species (i.e. Acineria uncinata, Epistylis sp.) were unaffected by exposure to anoxia. In the laboratory-scale units, the 60 min anoxic/anaerobic period resulted in good process performance (TOC and BOD removal of 97-98% respectively), nitrification (80-90%), denitrification (52%) but poor levels of biological P-removal (12%); with the protozoan community moderately affected but still diverse with high abundances. Increasing the length of anoxia to up to 200 min did not enhance denitrification although P-removal rates increased to between 22 and 33%; however, ciliate species richness and total abundance both decreased and sludge settleability became poorer. The study shows that activated sludge ciliate protozoa display a range of tolerances to anoxia that result in altered ciliate communities depending on the length of combined anoxic/anaerobic periods within the treatment process. It is recommended that anoxic/anaerobic periods should be optimised to sustain the protozoan community while achieving maximum performance and nutrient removal.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21329959     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

1.  A comparative analysis of the characteristics of a range of real and synthetic wastewaters.

Authors:  E O'Flaherty; N F Gray
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Eukaryotic molecular diversity at different steps of the wastewater treatment plant process reveals more phylogenetic novel lineages.

Authors:  Rakia Chouari; Marie Leonard; Moez Bouali; Sonda Guermazi; Naima Rahli; Ines Zrafi; Loïc Morin; Abdelghani Sghir
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Eukaryotic Community Shift in Response to Organic Loading Rate of an Aerobic Trickling Filter (Down-Flow Hanging Sponge Reactor) Treating Domestic Sewage.

Authors:  Yuma Miyaoka; Masashi Hatamoto; Takashi Yamaguchi; Kazuaki Syutsubo
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Co-treatment of acid mine drainage with municipal wastewater: performance evaluation.

Authors:  Theresa A Hughes; Nicholas F Gray
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Ciliated protozoa community of a combined UASB-activated sludge system in southeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Isabel Cristina Vidal Siqueira-Castro; Juliane Araújo Greinert-Goulart; Renato Rossetto; José Roberto Guimarães; Regina Maura Bueno Franco
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Revealing the diversity and quantity of peritrich ciliates in environmental samples using specific primer-based PCR and quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Xihan Liu; Jun Gong
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.