Literature DB >> 23161500

Co-treatment of acid mine drainage with municipal wastewater: performance evaluation.

Theresa A Hughes1, Nicholas F Gray.   

Abstract

Co-treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) with municipal wastewater (MWW) using the activated sludge process is a novel treatment technology offering potential savings over alternative systems in materials, proprietary chemicals and energy inputs. The impacts of AMD on laboratory-scale activated sludge units (plug-flow and sequencing batch reactors) treating synthetic MWW were investigated. Synthetic AMD containing Al, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb, Zn and SO4 at a range of concentrations and pH values was formulated to simulate three possible co-treatment processes, i.e., (1) adding raw AMD to the activated sludge aeration tank, (2) pre-treating AMD prior to adding to the aeration tank by mixing with digested sludge and (3) pre-treating AMD by mixing with screened MWW. Continuous AMD loading to the activated sludge reactors during co-treatment did not cause a significant decrease in chemical oxygen demand (COD), 5-day biochemical oxygen demand, or total organic carbon removal; average COD removal rates ranged from 87-93%. Enhanced phosphate removal was observed in reactors loaded with Fe- and Al-rich AMD, with final effluent TP concentrations<2 mg/L. Removal rates for dissolved Al, Cu, Fe and Pb were 52-84%, 47-61%, 74-86% and 100%, respectively, in both systems. Manganese and Zn removal were strongly linked to acidity; removal from net-acidic AMD was <10% for both metals, whereas removal from circum-neutral AMD averaged 93-95% for Mn and 58-90% for Zn. Pre-mixing with screened MWW was the best process option in terms of AMD neutralization and metal removal. However, significant MWW alkalinity was consumed, suggesting an alkali supplement may be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23161500     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-1303-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  36 in total

1.  Sub-lethal effects of heavy metals on activated sludge microorganisms.

Authors:  H Chua; P H Yu; S N Sin; M W Cheung
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Biochemical oxygen demand and nutrient processing in a novel multi-stage raw municipal wastewater and acid mine drainage passive co-treatment system.

Authors:  W H Strosnider; B K Winfrey; R W Nairn
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Adsorption of heavy metals onto sewage sludge-derived materials.

Authors:  F Rozada; M Otero; A Morán; A I García
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Statistical validation of sulfate quantification methods used for analysis of acid mine drainage.

Authors:  David J Reisman; Vijayakumar Sundaram; Souhail R Al-Abed; Derrick Allen
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.057

5.  Evaluation of iron ochre from mine drainage treatment for removal of phosphorus from wastewater.

Authors:  K E Dobbie; K V Heal; J Aumônier; K A Smith; A Johnston; P L Younger
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Potential effects of desalinated water quality on the operation stability of wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  Beni Lew; Malka Cochva; Ori Lahav
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 7.  The fate of metals in wastewater treated by the activated sludge process and membrane bioreactors: a brief review.

Authors:  Ana Santos; Simon Judd
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2009-11-24

8.  Enumeration of protozoan ciliates in activated sludge: determination of replicate number using probability.

Authors:  Donata Dubber; N F Gray
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Biodegradability simulation studies in semicontinuous activated sludge reactors with low (microgram/L range) and standard (ppm range) chemical concentrations.

Authors:  U T Berg; N Nyholm
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Heavy metals removal from acid mine drainage water using biogenic hydrogen sulphide and effluent from anaerobic treatment: effect of pH.

Authors:  A M Jiménez-Rodríguez; M M Durán-Barrantes; R Borja; E Sánchez; M F Colmenarejo; F Raposo
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 10.588

View more
  3 in total

1.  Performance assessment of laboratory and field-scale multi-step passive treatment of iron-rich acid mine drainage for design improvement.

Authors:  Tsiverihasina V Rakotonimaro; Carmen Mihaela Neculita; Bruno Bussière; Thomas Genty; Gérald J Zagury
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Organic materials retain high proportion of protons, iron and aluminium from acid sulphate soil drainage water with little subsequent release.

Authors:  Tan Dang; Luke M Mosley; Rob Fitzpatrick; Petra Marschner
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Functional Interrelationships of Microorganisms in Iron-Based Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment.

Authors:  Musfique Ahmed; Rifat Anwar; Dongyang Deng; Emily Garner; Lian-Shin Lin
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.