Literature DB >> 21328339

Lower sensitivity of screening mammography after previous benign breast surgery.

Vivian van Breest Smallenburg1, Lucien E M Duijm, Adri C Voogd, Johanna H Groenewoud, Frits H Jansen, Mike van Beek, Marieke W J Louwman.   

Abstract

Few data are available on the effect of previous benign breast surgery on screening mammography accuracy. We determined whether sensitivity of screening mammography and tumor characteristics are different for women with and without previous benign breast surgery. We included a consecutive series of 317,398 screening mammograms of women screened between 1997 and 2008. During 2-year follow-up, clinical data, breast imaging, biopsy and surgery reports were collected from women with screen-detected or interval breast cancers. Screening sensitivity, tumor biology and tumor stages were compared between 168 women with breast cancer and prior ipsilateral benign breast surgery and 2,039 women with breast cancer but without previous ipsilateral, benign breast surgery. The sensitivity of screening mammography was significantly lower for women with prior surgery [64.3% (108/168) versus 73.4% (1,496/2,039), p = 0.01]. The concomitant increased interval cancer risk remained significant after logistic regression adjustment for age and breast density (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1). Comparing screen-detected cancers in women with and without prior breast surgery, no significant differences in estrogen receptor status (p = 0.56), mitotic activity (p = 0.17), proportions of large (T2+) tumors (p = 0.6) or lymph node positive tumors (p = 0.4) were found. Also for interval cancers, no differences were found in estrogen receptor status (p = 0.41), mitotic activity (p = 0.39), proportions of large tumors (p = 0.9) and lymph node positive tumors (p = 0.5) between women with and without prior breast surgery. We conclude that sensitivity of screening mammography is significantly lower in women with previous benign breast surgery than without, but tumor characteristics are comparable both for screen detected cancers and interval cancers.
Copyright © 2011 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21328339     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  7 in total

1.  Rethinking: Ideal Screening Age for Breast Cancer in Developing Countries.

Authors:  Maha Abdel Hadi; Hefzi Al Ratrout; Hamid Al Wadaani
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-07-01

2.  Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study.

Authors:  Joost Nederend; Lucien Em Duijm; Adri C Voogd; Johanna H Groenewoud; Frits H Jansen; Marieke Wj Louwman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 6.466

3.  Frequency and characteristics of contralateral breast abnormalities following recall at screening mammography.

Authors:  Joost R C Lameijer; Angela Mp Coolen; Adri C Voogd; Luc J Strobbe; Marieke W J Louwman; Dick Venderink; Vivian C Tjan-Heijnen; Lucien E M Duijm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Trends in frequency and outcome of high-risk breast lesions at core needle biopsy in women recalled at biennial screening mammography, a multiinstitutional study.

Authors:  Jacky D Luiten; Bram Korte; Adri C Voogd; Willem Vreuls; Ernest J T Luiten; Luc J Strobbe; Matthieu J C M Rutten; Menno L Plaisier; Paul N Lohle; Marianne J H Hooijen; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Lucien E M Duijm
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Breast cancer survivors' risk of interval cancers and false positive results in organized mammography screening.

Authors:  Sisse Helle Njor; Ilse Vejborg; Mette Bach Larsen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Trends in breast biopsies for abnormalities detected at screening mammography: a population-based study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  V van Breest Smallenburg; J Nederend; A C Voogd; J W W Coebergh; M van Beek; F H Jansen; W J Louwman; L E M Duijm
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone

Authors:  Ernest Usang Ekpo; Maram Alakhras; Patrick Brennan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-02-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.