PURPOSE: After acute myocardial infarction (AMI), left ventricular (LV) remodelling may occur despite successful reperfusion. This study aimed to investigate by gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) the long-term evolution of myocardial perfusion and LV function after AMI and to identify the predictors of LV remodelling. METHODS: Sixty-eight AMI patients successfully treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention underwent (99m)Tc-sestamibi gated SPECT at 1 month (baseline) and over 6-month follow-up after the acute event. LV remodelling was defined as 20% increase in LV end-diastolic volume at follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, patients with remodelling (n = 14) showed larger (infarct size 29.3 ± 7.8%) and more transmural (infarct severity 0.28 ± 0.10) infarctions, and reduced LV ejection fraction (35.4 ± 5.6%), but similar LV volume indexes, compared to patients without remodelling (n = 54) (infarct size 20.8 ± 14.4%, p < 0.05, infarct severity 0.40 ± 0.11, p < 0.001, ejection fraction 44.5 ± 9.2, p < 0.001). At stepwise multivariate regression analysis, infarct severity showed the best predictive value for predicting LV remodelling (F = 5.54, p < 0.05). Using the thresholds identified by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, infarct size and severity detected patients with remodelling with 75% accuracy and 95% negative predictive value. Infarct resorption (defined as the defect size difference between follow-up and baseline) was comparable between patients with (-4.4 ± 8.4%) and without remodelling (-6.8 ± 9.4%) (p = NS). CONCLUSION: Perfusion parameters assessed by gated SPECT in the subacute phase after successfully treated AMI correlate with changes in functional parameters at long-term follow-up. Infarct severity is more effective than infarct size, but both are helpful for predicting LV remodelling.
PURPOSE: After acute myocardial infarction (AMI), left ventricular (LV) remodelling may occur despite successful reperfusion. This study aimed to investigate by gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) the long-term evolution of myocardial perfusion and LV function after AMI and to identify the predictors of LV remodelling. METHODS: Sixty-eight AMI patients successfully treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention underwent (99m)Tc-sestamibi gated SPECT at 1 month (baseline) and over 6-month follow-up after the acute event. LV remodelling was defined as 20% increase in LV end-diastolic volume at follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, patients with remodelling (n = 14) showed larger (infarct size 29.3 ± 7.8%) and more transmural (infarct severity 0.28 ± 0.10) infarctions, and reduced LV ejection fraction (35.4 ± 5.6%), but similar LV volume indexes, compared to patients without remodelling (n = 54) (infarct size 20.8 ± 14.4%, p < 0.05, infarct severity 0.40 ± 0.11, p < 0.001, ejection fraction 44.5 ± 9.2, p < 0.001). At stepwise multivariate regression analysis, infarct severity showed the best predictive value for predicting LV remodelling (F = 5.54, p < 0.05). Using the thresholds identified by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, infarct size and severity detected patients with remodelling with 75% accuracy and 95% negative predictive value. Infarct resorption (defined as the defect size difference between follow-up and baseline) was comparable between patients with (-4.4 ± 8.4%) and without remodelling (-6.8 ± 9.4%) (p = NS). CONCLUSION: Perfusion parameters assessed by gated SPECT in the subacute phase after successfully treated AMI correlate with changes in functional parameters at long-term follow-up. Infarct severity is more effective than infarct size, but both are helpful for predicting LV remodelling.
Authors: Olivier De Winter; Pieter De Bondt; Christophe Van De Wiele; Guy De Backer; Rudi A Dierckx; Johan De Sutter Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Jeroen J Bax; Arend F L Schinkel; Eric Boersma; Abdou Elhendy; Vittoria Rizzello; Alexander Maat; Jos R T C Roelandt; Ernst E van der Wall; Don Poldermans Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-09-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: L Bolognese; P Buonamici; G Cerisano; A Santini; N Carrabba; G M Santoro; D Antoniucci; P F Fazzini Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: M Galli; C Marcassa; R Bolli; P Giannuzzi; P L Temporelli; A Imparato; P L Silva Orrego; R Giubbini; A Giordano; L Tavazzi Journal: Circulation Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gunnar K Lund; Alexander Stork; Kai Muellerleile; Achim A Barmeyer; Martin P Bansmann; Meike Knefel; Ulrike Schlichting; Martin Müller; Pablo E Verde; Gerhard Adam; Thomas Meinertz; Maythem Saeed Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Andaleb Kholmukhamedov; Christina Logdon; Jiangting Hu; Richard A McKinney; Francis G Spinale; John J Lemasters; Rupak Mukherjee Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 4.733