Literature DB >> 21326799

Carotid intervention 1: who should be treated?

Trevor Cleveland1.   

Abstract

Stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the modern world. Carotid artery atheromatous disease is responsible for a significant number of these events. The effects of carotid artery disease may be prevented by appropriate treatment. All patients with known atheromatous disease should be treated with medical therapy. Despite this, some patients remain at high risk of stroke, which may be reduced by the selective use of additional therapies such as carotid endarterectomy or carotid stenting. Patients who have had recent neurological symptoms, attributable to their carotid disease, may benefit most from these additional treatments, particularly if the treatment is performed soon after the event. The operation needs to be performed with low complication rates. Some groups of patients who have been free of neurological symptoms may also benefit from these additional therapies, but these patients have a much lower inherent risk of stroke, and so the potential benefits are less. In such circumstances it is even more important that the operations are performed with minimal morbidity. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafts, who also have carotid disease, are at elevated risk of stroke, and it is common practice to treat both conditions. There is no strong data to support this practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid; endarterectomy; stenosis; stent; stroke

Year:  2007        PMID: 21326799      PMCID: PMC3036410          DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-980044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0739-9529            Impact factor:   1.513


  24 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  S Claiborne Johnston
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Does the modern concept of 'best medical therapy' render carotid surgery obsolete?

Authors:  A R Naylor
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.069

3.  Stent placement for the treatment of occlusive atherosclerotic carotid artery disease in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Demetrius K Lopes; Robert A Mericle; Giuseppe Lanzino; Ajay K Wakhloo; Lee R Guterman; L Nelson Hopkins
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis?

Authors:  C Warlow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-05-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  A systematic review of outcomes following staged and synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  A R Naylor; R L Cuffe; P M Rothwell; P R F Bell
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.069

7.  Carotid surgery versus medical therapy in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The CASANOVA Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 8.  A systematic review of outcome following synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass: influence of surgical and patient variables.

Authors:  R Naylor; R L Cuffe; P M Rothwell; I M Loftus; P R Bell
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.069

Review 9.  Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the ad hoc Committee, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W S Moore; H J Barnett; H G Beebe; E F Bernstein; B J Brener; T Brott; L R Caplan; A Day; J Goldstone; R W Hobson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Does the angiographic appearance of a carotid stenosis predict the risk of stroke independently of the degree of stenosis?

Authors:  P M Rothwell; R Salinas; L A Ferrando; J Slattery; C P Warlow
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.350

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.