Literature DB >> 21325717

Verification of structural and electrostatic properties obtained by the use of different pseudoatom databases.

Joanna Maria Bąk1, Sławomir Domagała, Christian Hübschle, Christian Jelsch, Birger Dittrich, Paulina Maria Dominiak.   

Abstract

The existing pseudoatom databases (ELMAM, Invariom, UBDB and ELMAM2) enable structure refinement to be performed with the use of aspherical scattering factors computed from the transferable aspherical atom model (TAAM) as an alternative to independent atom model refinement. In addition, electrostatic properties can be estimated with the help of the databases. The quality of the structural and electrostatic properties obtained from the individual databases was tested. On the basis of a 100 K high-resolution single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiment on L-His-L-Ala dihydrate and 23 K high-resolution data for L-Ala [Destro & Marsh (1988). J. Phys. Chem. 92, 966-973], the structural properties, electron-density distributions and molecular electrostatic potentials obtained from different TAAMs were compared to each other and to reference models. Experimental multipolar models and theoretical models refined against theoretical structure factors computed from periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations were compared to the TAAMs in order to determine which model best describes the crystal-field effect. Unperturbed wavefunctions based on the MP2 and DFT calculations and properties obtained directly from these were used as a reference to judge how properly the databases reproduce the properties of isolated molecules. For Gly-L-His dihydrate, D,L-His and the above-mentioned two crystal structures, deviations of the molecular dipole moments and Coulombic intermolecular interaction energies from the reference values were examined. Root-mean-square deviations (RMSDs) and correlation coefficients were used as a quantitative measure of the quality of the analysed properties. TAAM refinements reproduce X-H bond lengths optimized in theoretical periodic calculations. Structural properties obtained from different database models are similar to each other. The anisotropic displacement parameters from TAAMs are similar to the results of experimental multipolar refinement; differences are about 0.5 and 2.5% for high-resolution and low-resolution data, respectively. Differences in dipole-moment magnitudes calculated from database models are about 5%, and directions differ by up to 30°. The values of electrostatic interaction energies estimated from the individual TAAMs differ greatly from each other and from the reference values. RMSDs are about 9-15 and 22-33 kJ mol(-1) for UBDB and the other database models, respectively.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21325717     DOI: 10.1107/S0108767310049731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A        ISSN: 0108-7673            Impact factor:   2.290


  20 in total

1.  Transferable aspherical atom model refinement of protein and DNA structures against ultrahigh-resolution X-ray data.

Authors:  Maura Malinska; Zbigniew Dauter
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 7.652

2.  DiSCaMB: a software library for aspherical atom model X-ray scattering factor calculations with CPUs and GPUs.

Authors:  Michał L Chodkiewicz; Szymon Migacz; Witold Rudnicki; Anna Makal; Jarosław A Kalinowski; Nigel W Moriarty; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Pavel V Afonine; Paul D Adams; Paulina Maria Dominiak
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.304

3.  Electrostatic interactions in aminoglycoside-RNA complexes.

Authors:  Marta Kulik; Anna M Goral; Maciej Jasiński; Paulina M Dominiak; Joanna Trylska
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  lamaGOET: an interface for quantum crystallography.

Authors:  Lorraine A Malaspina; Alessandro Genoni; Simon Grabowsky
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.304

5.  Hirshfeld atom refinement.

Authors:  Silvia C Capelli; Hans-Beat Bürgi; Birger Dittrich; Simon Grabowsky; Dylan Jayatilaka
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.769

6.  Refinement of organic crystal structures with multipolar electron scattering factors.

Authors:  Barbara Gruza; Michał Leszek Chodkiewicz; Joanna Krzeszczakowska; Paulina Maria Dominiak
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

7.  The advanced treatment of hydrogen bonding in quantum crystallography.

Authors:  Lorraine A Malaspina; Alessandro Genoni; Dylan Jayatilaka; Michael J Turner; Kunihisa Sugimoto; Eiji Nishibori; Simon Grabowsky
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.304

8.  Charge density studies of multicentre two-electron bonding of an anion radical at non-ambient temperature and pressure.

Authors:  Valentina Milašinović; Krešimir Molčanov; Anna Krawczuk; Nikita E Bogdanov; Boris A Zakharov; Elena V Boldyreva; Christian Jelsch; Biserka Kojić-Prodić
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.769

9.  A Comparative Study of Transferable Aspherical Pseudoatom Databank and Classical Force Fields for Predicting Electrostatic Interactions in Molecular Dimers.

Authors:  Prashant Kumar; Sławomir A Bojarowski; Katarzyna N Jarzembska; Sławomir Domagała; Kenno Vanommeslaeghe; Alexander D Mackerell; Paulina M Dominiak
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 10.  Contributions of charge-density research to medicinal chemistry.

Authors:  Birger Dittrich; Chérif F Matta
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 4.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.