Literature DB >> 21325111

Cost-utility of aspirin and proton pump inhibitors for primary prevention.

Stephanie R Earnshaw1, James Scheiman, A Mark Fendrick, Cheryl McDade, Michael Pignone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aspirin reduces myocardial infarction but increases gastrointestinal tract (GI) bleeding. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may reduce upper GI bleeding. We estimate the cost-utility of aspirin treatment with or without a PPI for coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention among men at different risks for CHD and GI bleeding.
METHODS: We updated a Markov model to compare costs and outcomes of low-dose aspirin plus PPI (omeprazole, 20 mg/d), low-dose aspirin alone, or no treatment for CHD prevention. We performed lifetime analyses in men with different risks for cardiovascular events and GI bleeding. Aspirin reduced nonfatal myocardial infarction by 30%, increased total stroke by 6%, and increased GI bleeding risk 2-fold. Adding a PPI reduced upper GI bleeding by 80%. Annual aspirin cost was $13.99; the generic PPI cost was $200.00.
RESULTS: In 45-year-old men with a 10-year CHD risk of 10% and 0.8 per 1000 annual GI bleeding risk, aspirin ($17,571 and 18.67 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) was more effective and less costly than no treatment ($18,483 and 18.44 QALYs). Compared with aspirin alone, aspirin plus PPI ($21,037 and 18.68 QALYs) had an incremental cost per QALY of $447,077. Results were similar in 55- and 65-year-old men. The incremental cost per QALY of adding a PPI was less than $50,000 per QALY at annual GI bleeding probabilities greater than 4 to 6 per 1000.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with aspirin for CHD prevention is less costly and more effective than no treatment in men older than 45 years with greater than 10-year, 10% CHD risks. Adding a PPI is not cost-effective for men with average GI bleeding risk but may be cost-effective for selected men at increased risk for GI bleeding. ©2011 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21325111      PMCID: PMC3137269          DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  23 in total

1.  Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women and men: a sex-specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Berger; Maria C Roncaglioni; Fausto Avanzini; Ierta Pangrazzi; Gianni Tognoni; David L Brown
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Proton-pump inhibitor use is not associated with osteoporosis or accelerated bone mineral density loss.

Authors:  Laura E Targownik; Lisa M Lix; Stella Leung; William D Leslie
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Hayden; Michael Pignone; Christopher Phillips; Cynthia Mulrow
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  The natural history of prevalent ischaemic heart disease in middle-aged men.

Authors:  F C Lampe; P H Whincup; S G Wannamethee; A G Shaper; M Walker; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Aspirin and risk of hemorrhagic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  J He; P K Whelton; B Vu; M J Klag
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-12-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Cardiovascular disease risk profiles.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P M Odell; P W Wilson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  A multi-country economic evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Mark Lamotte; Lieven Annemans; Thomas Evers; Maria Kubin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Lansoprazole for the prevention of recurrences of ulcer complications from long-term low-dose aspirin use.

Authors:  Kam Chuen Lai; Shiu Kum Lam; Kent Man Chu; Benjamin C Y Wong; Wai Mo Hui; Wayne H C Hu; George K K Lau; Wai Man Wong; Man Fung Yuen; Annie O O Chan; Ching Lung Lai; John Wong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Aspirin, statins, or both drugs for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease events in men: a cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Stephanie Earnshaw; Jeffrey A Tice; Mark J Pletcher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Long-term survival after first-ever stroke: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project.

Authors:  M S Dennis; J P Burn; P A Sandercock; J M Bamford; D T Wade; C P Warlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: economic considerations.

Authors:  William S Weintraub; Leonid Mandel; Sandra A Weiss
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  PPI therapy: PPI plus aspirin for secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Authors:  Siew C Ng; Francis K L Chan
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Effect of including cancer mortality on the cost-effectiveness of aspirin for primary prevention in men.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Stephanie Earnshaw; Cheryl McDade; Mark J Pletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  What you need to know when you prescribe a proton pump inhibitor.

Authors:  A Norman; C J Hawkey
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-06-24

5.  Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Asymptomatic Screening for Hypertension and High Cholesterol and Aspirin Counseling for Primary Prevention.

Authors:  Steven P Dehmer; Michael V Maciosek; Amy B LaFrance; Thomas J Flottemesch
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin versus weekly semaglutide as add-on therapy for Type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Margaret F Zupa; Ronald A Codario; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.040

Review 7.  Estimation of the impact of warfarin's time-in-therapeutic range on stroke and major bleeding rates and its influence on the medical cost avoidance associated with novel oral anticoagulant use-learnings from ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF, and RE-LY trials.

Authors:  Alpesh Amin; Steve Deitelzweig; Yonghua Jing; Dinara Makenbaeva; Daniel Wiederkehr; Jay Lin; John Graham
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Oral Anticoagulants in Stroke Prevention among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chia-Te Liao; Mei-Chuan Lee; Zhih-Cherng Chen; Li-Jung Elizabeth Ku; Jung-Der Wang; Han Siong Toh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.672

9.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Vs. Vitamin K Antagonists in the Elderly With Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From the Evidence in a Real-World Setting.

Authors:  Yue Wu; Chi Zhang; Zhi-Chun Gu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-29

Review 10.  Esomeprazole and aspirin fixed combination for the prevention of cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Katelyn W Sylvester; Judy Wm Cheng; Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.